I Can Crafts Reach 2c Relative to Me?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Abbott287287
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
Abbott287287
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Separation speed
Simple question for you guys. Thanks in advance for the help.

If you are standing on earth with a watch and hypothetical crafts to your left and right instantly take off 180 degrees apart at the speed of light, at the 1 second mark on YOUR watch they will be 372,000 miles apart. From YOUR perspective, it seems they should be moving apart at 2c. You measure the distance they traveled at its exactly as above. You were stationary and your watch clicked one second. It seems they had to be moving apart at 2c, but that would be the upper limit as to how fast they can move away from each other from your perspective. No laws are being broken as each craft is moving at c, not above it. From each crafts perspective I know it would be totally different. Is this correct or not? If its wrong, please explain how.
VERY much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's correct, the upper limit for separation speed is ##2c##. Note that a massive spacecraft can't actually reach ##c## in your reference frame, but can get arbitrarily close to ##c##.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes FactChecker, Dale and Abbott287287
Much appreciated. Its being argued on a different forum. :smile:
 
Abbott287287 said:
and right instantly take off 180 degrees apart at the speed of light,
That’s not possible, but we can fix this without changing the basic sense of your question by specifying that their speed relative to you is not ##c## but something like ##.99c##.

If one is moving to left at speed ##v\lt c## and the other is moving to the right at the same speed, you will observe them separating at speed ##2v \lt 2c##.

However, their speed relative to one another will be ##2v/(1+v^2)## which is less than ##c##. Google for “relativistic velocity addition” to see how I get that result.

(And note that I am measuring time in seconds and distances in light-seconds so that ##c=1##. This is a handy and very common, almost universal, trick for not cluttering the equations up with a whole bunch of ##c## and ##c^2## factors)
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Back
Top