I Can Curves Live Out of Embedding Diagrams?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Diagram
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
The embedding diagram is well known for its qualitative representation of how the stress energy tensor curve the spacetime. We can construct a map from a general spherical metric to a cylindrical metric if we want to construct such diagrams.

Now, my confusion is if there exist curves out of the surface. It seems to me that curves can indeed exist out of the diagrams. Since they are only a 3D representation of the curvature of the spacetime, a curve living out of the surface does not means that it lives out the spacetime. Now, even so this line of thought seems right to me, i am not 100% of this!

For example, to construct a embbeding diagram for the Schwarzild metric, we do as follow:

Let ##\theta = \pi/2, dt = 0##

##ds^2_{\text{Schwazrchild}} = ds^2_{\text{cylinder}} = dr^2 + r^2 d\phi^2 + dz^2##

So we get ##r_{\text{Schwazrchild}} = r_{\text{cylinder}}##

And when we assume ##z=z(r)##, we can get a whole expression for ##z = z(r)## and then construct our embedding diagram.

But we assumed ##\theta = \pi/2##! So technically, curves can live out of it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, Flamm's paraboloid is not an embedding of Schwarzschild spacetime. It's an embedding of a particular 2d spacelike slice of Schwarzschild spacetime. So timelike curves in the original spacetime would only appear as dots if they intersect it at all and, indeed, only spacelike curves that lie in the plane you happen to pick would appear as lines.

So you can certainly have curves in spacetime that lie outside the slice you chose to represent. I don't think they'd appear elsewhere in your diagram, though. They're just "off the edge of the map".
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
LCSphysicist said:
they are only a 3D representation of the curvature of the spacetime
No, they are a 3D representation of the curvature of a 2-dimensional "slice" out of a spacelike surface of constant time. In the case of the Flamm paraboloid, the embedding diagram usually seen for Schwarzschild spacetime, the 2-dimensional "slice" is the equatorial plane ##\theta = \pi / 2## of a spacelike surface of constant Schwarzschild coordinate time.

LCSphysicist said:
So technically, curves can live out of it right?
It depends on what you mean. If you mean, are there curves in the spacetime that are not represented in the embedding diagram, of course there are, lots of them. If you mean, are there curves in the 3-d spacelike surface of constant time hat are not represented in the embedding diagram, of course that's true to.

But if you mean, are there curves in the 3-d "space" of the embedding diagram, that do not lie in the 2-surface represented in that diagram, but which represent curves in the spacetime (or in the 3-d spacelike surface of constant time), then no, there are none. The 3-d "space" of the diagram is unphysical; only the 2-surface represented in that diagram represents anything physical.
 
I suppose it's possible to "stack" Flamm's paraboloids to produce a (2+1)d spacetime diagram. I don't think that's an embedding any more, and probably no more helpful than just mapping Schwarzschild ##r,\phi,t## coordinates to Euclidean ##r,\phi,z## ones, but it could be done. All lines that lie in the equatorial plane (spacelike, timelike and null) would appear on the map.
 
Ibix said:
I suppose it's possible to "stack" Flamm's paraboloids to produce a (2+1)d spacetime diagram.
No, because you would need at least a 4-dimensional embedding space and we can't either draw or visualize such a thing.

Ibix said:
I don't think that's an embedding any more
It would have to be, because you need an embedding space in which to draw the Flamm paraboloids. Otherwise you don't have a diagram.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top