Can diplomacy truly end armed campaigns?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter brewnog
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the recent announcement by the IRA to end its armed campaign and pursue peaceful actions. Participants explore the implications of this decision, the historical context of the IRA, and the potential for ongoing violence despite the ceasefire. The conversation touches on themes of terrorism, sectarianism, and public perception in both the UK and the US.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the IRA's commitment to peace, suggesting that factions may continue violence under different banners.
  • Others argue that the IRA has not engaged in significant terrorist activities recently, citing specific incidents to illustrate their points.
  • A participant highlights the complexity of attributing violence to the IRA, suggesting that not all criminal acts by individuals should be seen as representative of the organization as a whole.
  • There is a discussion about the cultural roots of sectarianism in Scotland and Ireland, with some asserting that it will persist despite a reduction in bombings.
  • One participant questions the reasons behind the reduction in IRA hostilities, seeking insights from those knowledgeable about the organization's history.
  • Several comments reflect on the changing nature of terrorism and the perception of groups like the IRA in contemporary contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the IRA's ceasefire. While some express hope for lasting peace, others remain doubtful about the sincerity of the commitment and the potential for continued violence.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various historical events and the evolution of the IRA, indicating a complex interplay of factors influencing current dynamics. The discussion includes differing interpretations of specific incidents and their relevance to the broader narrative of the IRA's activities.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying conflict resolution, terrorism, and the historical context of the IRA, as well as individuals seeking to understand the nuances of sectarian violence in the UK and Ireland.

  • #31
Patty, sorry. I thought your question was an excellent one and I don't feel it's been answered yet, mainly because it's not an easy answer to give!

In short, I do believe that diplomacy has been a major contributing factor to this supposed resolution. However, I think it would be prudent to have some cynicism; several hundred years of conflict being resolved in an afternoon is a tall order. We should all cross our fingers, and look to the future.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ooops - you caught me out. I glommed onto a few key phrases that were new for me in the past short history:

Thatcher, Labour, Diplomacy, Catholic oppression...

And didn't read for details. I will continue to follow the thread. My interest of course is in ideas as to how we could approach more global terror problems with more success.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K