A Can Einstein Tensor be the Product of Two 4-Vectors?

empdee4
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
For particles of uniform mass and uniform momentum, stress-energy tensor can be written as product of two 4-vectors, can Einstein tensor be written in the same way?
In Gravitation by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler (p.139), stress-energy tensor for a single type of particles with uniform mass m and uniform momentum p (and E = p2 +m2) ½ ) can be written as a product of two 4-vectors,T(E,p) = (E,p)×(E,p)/[V(E2 – p2 )½ ]
Since Einstein equation is G = 8πGT, I am wondering if the left hand side, Einstein tensor, can also be written in the same way,
G(T,X) = (T,X)×(T,X)/[V (T2 – X2 )½ ]
If not, in what special case, or in what approximation, it can be expressed this way.
Thanks very much,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
empdee4 said:
In Gravitation by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler (p.139), stress-energy tensor for a single type of particles with uniform mass m and uniform momentum p (and E = p2 +m2) ½ ) can be written as a product of two 4-vectors
Basically this is the SET of a perfect fluid with zero pressure, usually called "dust" in the literature. But this is a highly idealized situation. As soon as you add nonzero pressure, the SET can no longer be expressed purely as a product of 4-vectors; see the very next page of MTW (equation 5.21).

empdee4 said:
Since Einstein equation is G = 8πGT, I am wondering if the left hand side, Einstein tensor, can also be written in the same way
Of course, just divide multiply ##T## by ##8 \pi##. That's what the equation says. But, as noted above, this is a highly idealized situation.
 
Last edited:
PeterDonis said:
Basically this is the SET of a perfect fluid with zero pressure, usually called "dust" in the literature. But this is a highly idealized situation. As soon as you add nonzero pressure, the SET can no longer be expressed purely as a product of 4-vectors; see the very next page of MTW (equation 5.21).Of course, just divide ##T## by ##8 \pi##. That's what the equation says. But, as noted above, this is a highly idealized situation.
Thanks very much for explanation.

Just not clear what T / 8π means.
 
empdee4 said:
Thanks very much for explanation.

Just not clear what T / 8π means.
It just means that each element of the Einstein tensor is equal to the equivalent element of the stress-energy tensor multiplied by ##8\pi G/c^4## (not divided - @PeterDonis made a typo). You still have a bunch of nasty simultaneous differential equations to solve to extract the metric tensor.
 
Ibix said:
It just means that each element of the Einstein tensor is equal to the equivalent element of the stress-energy tensor multiplied by ##8\pi G/c^4## (not divided - @PeterDonis made a typo).
Oops, yes. I've fixed the post now.
 
Thanks for clarification. Does it mean Einstein equation in this very special case can be reduced to a vector equation, as follows:

G = 8πGT
T
(E,p) = (E,p)×(E,p)/[V (E2 – p2 )½ ]
G(T,X) = (T,X)×(T,X)/[V (T2 – X2 )½ ]

Thus, Einstein equation becomes

(T,X)x(T,X)/[V(T–X2)1/2]
=8πG(E,p)×8πG(E,p)/[V8πG(E2–p2)½]

which can be reduced to a 4-vector equation,

(T,X) =8πG(E,p)

thanks very much
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Back
Top