Can Elastic Collisions Lead to Right Angles Between Particles?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in classical mechanics, specifically focusing on elastic collisions between two identical particles. The original poster attempts to demonstrate that the directions of the two particles can form a right angle post-collision, utilizing conservation laws and vector analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of linear momentum and kinetic energy, questioning the definitions of variables and the coordinate system used. There are inquiries about the mathematical expressions derived from the inner product and the implications of momentum vectors in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing various approaches and suggestions for manipulating equations. Some participants are exploring the geometric interpretation of momentum vectors and the relationships between angles, while others are questioning the correctness of the expressions used.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the definitions of variables and the dimensionality of the problem, which some participants are addressing. The discussion also highlights the need for careful consideration of vector components and their implications in the context of elastic collisions.

itsjorge
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A particle with mass m is at rest. A second one, identical to the last one hits the first one. Show that in the case of a perfectly elastic collision (Q=0) the directions of the two particles make a right angle.

You can't assume that both final velocities will be equal. Here's what I've got from using: 1. the conservation of linear momentum. 2. The conservation of kinetic energy (Q=0). 3. Scalar product between the initial velocities.

v=u1cosα + u2 cosβ
u1 sinα = u2 sinβ
v2=u12 + u22
cos(α+β)=(u12 cosα cosβ + u22 sinα sinβ) / (u1 u2)

And hell, I really can't solve this system...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't defined the variables you used. You didn't say how you established the coordinate system. If you are going to portray a collision in 3-dimensions as 2-dimensional problem, you should say why this is possible.
 
OK. That's my bad, I'm sorry. We're in 2 dimensions.
v represents the initial velocity of the particle. (The one hitting).
u represents the final velocity.
α, β represent the angles made with the direction of the particle 1 (The one hitting)
- α for the one that was moving previously and β for the one that was at rest.
They way I got to that system is explained up there.
 
Why does your expression derrived from the inner product (u1 \cos(\alpha), u1 \sin(\alpha)) \cdot (u2\cos(\beta), u2\sin(\beta)) have the factors u_1^2 , u_2^2? Why not the factor u_1u_2?
 
Agree. You're right. Anyways, is this the way to proceed?
 
Hi, manipulate your equations from conservation of linear of momentum and kinetic energy (three equations) to eliminate all instances of ##v, u_1## and ##u_2##.
 
The simplistic way to look at it is that two momentum vectors add to be the vector velocity V and that conservation of energy implies that the lengh of the hypotenuse V squared is the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides. Hence it is a right triangle. Can we put that into algebra?
 
Try the law of cosines for triangles.

(By the way, the angle between the two velocity vectors wouldn't be sum of angles \alpha, \beta , it would be a difference of them. The the addition law for cos(A +B) should be consistent with the signs of the cosine terms in the inner product.)
 
Another approach is to work with the momentum vectors without breaking them into components. Conservation of momentum gives you
$$\vec{p}_1 + \vec{p}_2 = \vec{p}'_1 + \vec{p}'_2$$ where ##\vec{p}_1 = 0##. Square both sides and use the fact that the kinetic energy can be written as ##\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m}##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K