- 1,437
- 535
Regarding aesthetics in quantum mechanical expressions, we had a thread from a tattoo artist in the Quantum Physics forum not too long ago which may be of interest to the readers here.
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
125 replies · 17K views
- 19,954
- 11,048
Reminder the contest is about the aesthetical beauty of an equation, not it's meaning or significance! 
Gold Member
- 2,630
- 2,244
Well, if it's just aesthetics and not significance, then how about this:
[tex]1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\cdots}}} = \sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\cdots}}}}[/tex]
[tex]1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{1+\cdots}}} = \sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\cdots}}}}[/tex]
- 19,954
- 11,048
TeethWhitener said:
Very cool!
Gold Member
- 2,630
- 2,244
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldenRatio.htmlGreg Bernhardt said:
It's funny because it's probably more significant to aesthetics than to math/physics.
- 2,802
- 605
Hard to tell the difference, and actually to be honest, the feeling is more about the things you know about that equation. A very good example is the Cauchy's integral theorem(mentioned by Samy_A). What I(and he and certainly many others) feel about that equation is not at all related to how it looks, e.g. that it has a ##\pi## downstairs and the integral sign has a circle in its middle. This equation is a reminder of all the beauty in complex analysis (So I should double what Samy_A said "Complex Analysis is pure poetry") and that's why he chose it and I voted for it.Greg Bernhardt said:Reminder the contest is about the aesthetical beauty of an equation, not it's meaning or significance!
Otherwise you should show the equations to people who don't know what they mean and ask them which is more beautiful!
- 22,170
- 3,335
Greg Bernhardt said:Reminder the contest is about the aesthetical beauty of an equation, not it's meaning or significance!
But the beauty IS the meaning!
- 19,954
- 11,048
Not this timemicromass said:
Think of these equations on a painting shown to people who don't know math.- 22,170
- 3,335
Greg Bernhardt said:Not this time
Then I honestly see no beauty in the equations. It's like showing me a book written in russian (I don't know any russian) and asking me to pick the most beautiful book based on the arrangement of the letters. I'm like: "ok...".
- 19,954
- 11,048
Then don't participate. I don't know math, but I find the equations interesting and beautiful like calligraphy. Be a designer not a mathematician.micromass said:
- 2,802
- 605
Why don't you participate?Greg Bernhardt said:
- 19,954
- 11,048
I'm the one giving out the prize!Shyan said:
Let's please get back to the contest. This thread is going to be very muddled.
Isaac0427
Gold Member
- 718
- 163
$$\frac{b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} + x = 0$$
I find that rearranging the quadratic formula gives a very appealing result.
I find that rearranging the quadratic formula gives a very appealing result.
Amrator
- 246
- 83
No idea what it means, but it's pretty.
##φ(λ_i)=z_i##
##φ(λ_i)=z_i##
- 583
- 186
The pre-quantization condition on ##M## (manifold):
[tex]\int_{\Sigma}\,\omega \,\in\, 2\pi \hbar\cdot \mathbb{Z}[/tex]
where ##\Sigma## closed 2-surface in ##M## and ##\omega## the symplectic structure, is very nice!
[tex]\int_{\Sigma}\,\omega \,\in\, 2\pi \hbar\cdot \mathbb{Z}[/tex]
where ##\Sigma## closed 2-surface in ##M## and ##\omega## the symplectic structure, is very nice!
- 942
- 395
The wave equation is quite aesthetically pleasing: $$\nabla^2 y = \frac{1}{v^2} \frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial t^2} $$
Jeff Rosenbury
- 746
- 145
An equation is an equality containing one or more variables. Here's an odd one I "borrowed" from an advertisement:
DaTario
- 1,097
- 46
This should be taken as an infinite set of equations...Jeff Rosenbury said:An equation is an equality containing one or more variables. Here's an odd one I "borrowed" from an advertisement:
It is not fair... Perturbation Hamiltonian (low intensity limit) for the interaction of radiation with atomic systems (semiclassical treatment):
$$H' (t)= -\frac{e}{mc}Ap -\frac{e}{mc}SB$$
where $$\text{m = particle mass}\\
\text{e = particle charge}\\
\text{S = particle spin}\\
\text{A = vector potential}\\
\text{B =} \nabla \times\text{A the magnetic field}$$
$$H' (t)= -\frac{e}{mc}Ap -\frac{e}{mc}SB$$
where $$\text{m = particle mass}\\
\text{e = particle charge}\\
\text{S = particle spin}\\
\text{A = vector potential}\\
\text{B =} \nabla \times\text{A the magnetic field}$$
- 22,170
- 3,335
DaTario said:This should be taken as an infinite set of equations...
Due to the Hilbert basis theorem, you can often make an infinite set of equations into one equation
DaTario
- 1,097
- 46
But we are seeing equations involving different quantities of physics (forces, angular momentum, photographic blurring, etc) the candidate should be asked to present the equation.micromass said:Due to the Hilbert basis theorem, you can often make an infinite set of equations into one equation
Besides the fact that the photo also presents inequalities.
- 4,042
- 2,084
You posted this yesterday, Thursday the 24th.Greg Bernhardt said:
I think you meant it would close next Thursday, the 31st.
Mondayman
- 328
- 503
Good old Pythagorean's Theorem.
a2+b2=c2
So simple, I always imagine its drawn in crayon.At the other end of the spectrum, there's this clunky, unwieldy thing...
a2+b2=c2
So simple, I always imagine its drawn in crayon.At the other end of the spectrum, there's this clunky, unwieldy thing...
couragerolls
- 3
- 6
[itex]i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi(r,t)}{\partial t}=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2\psi(r,t)+V(r)\psi(r,t)[/itex]
with the beautiful [itex]\psi[/itex] and its curves . Ta-da! The nefarious Schrödinger equation!
with the beautiful [itex]\psi[/itex] and its curves . Ta-da! The nefarious Schrödinger equation!
Last edited:
- 4,042
- 2,084
Mandelbrot (in equation form):
For any [itex]c; z_0=0;[/itex] and [itex]z_n=z^2_{n-1}+c[/itex]:
[itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty} {(z_n-z_{n-1})} = 0[/itex]
For any [itex]c; z_0=0;[/itex] and [itex]z_n=z^2_{n-1}+c[/itex]:
[itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty} {(z_n-z_{n-1})} = 0[/itex]
CynicusRex
Gold Member
- 98
- 68
micromass said:
Thats a loss on your part sadly. The beauty of formulas is one of the main reasons I decided to study science this 'late' in life. I have always been astonished by the look of complex formulas, knowing it's all logical and every part is crucial. I even use it as an argument when people ask me why I want to study physics:
"While many men look at cars in admiration, I look at formulas the same way even without understanding them. But now I do want to understand them."
I'll enter the contest by summoning the Devil's curve:
which produces things like:
Both the formula and result are beautiful. Knowing people were doing math, science, etc., so many years ago, inspires me to do the same. It stupefies me how people like Newton were able to do all of their superfly work. It also saddens me that education is helping so little in making math and science inspirational and fun. I talk too much. Awesome contest.
- 1,653
- 415
Patrick Sossoumihen said:
Depends on how you look at it.
ProfuselyQuarky
Gold Member
- 857
- 588
Hey, that was mine . . .Mondayman said:
- 1,801
- 1,199
I thought one needed to "make up" one "true" and "beautiful" equation and not just "pick up" one known equation!Greg Bernhardt said:Reminder the contest is about the aesthetical beauty of an equation, not it's meaning or significance!
- 19,954
- 11,048
Either or :)samalkhaiat said: