Can f(x) Be Expressed as an Exponent of x When Reversing a Series Expansion?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the possibility of expressing a function f(x) as an exponent of x when reversing a series expansion, particularly in the context of Taylor series. Participants explore the implications of power series and their complexities, as well as the potential for simplification of known series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the sum of all antiderivatives can be expressed as x^y or another exponent, referencing a series expansion for distance with respect to time.
  • Another participant identifies the series in question as a Taylor series and seeks clarification on reversing it to obtain f(x).
  • A different participant asserts that there is no elementary way to derive a function from a known power series due to the complexity of some power series.
  • One participant expresses disappointment at the lack of a general method for reversing expansions but inquires about examples where such reversals have been achieved.
  • Another participant mentions that while there are examples of reversing expansions, they are typically limited to textbook problems and suggests looking into generating functions and power series for more insights.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that reversing a power series to obtain a function is complex and lacks a general method. However, there is no consensus on specific examples or methods that may exist.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in deriving functions from power series, noting the dependence on the complexity of the series and the absence of a universal approach.

dst
Messages
379
Reaction score
0
Can the sum of all antiderivatives equating each derivative of a term x, to units in x, be expressed as x^y or some other exponent, provided those sums are known? I have no idea if that made sense in mathematese, so a simpler way would be to ask:

Taking the equation for distance/displacement/elephants with respect to time:

s = ut + 1/2at^2 + 1/3bt^3 + ... 1/26zt^26

Or: http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/4659/28096134sz4.jpg

(no idea how to use tex, no images either? is that notation even correct?)

Can f(x) be expressed as an exponent of x, analytically?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess I'm horrid at explaining.

Yes, it's a Taylor series, but can you reverse it and get f(x) from it?

Let's say you're calculating distance from a point, i.e. s = ut + 1/2(at^2) + 1/3(bt^3), if you know a and b, could you simplify it?
 
Since some power series can give horrendously complex functions, no, there is no (elementary) way to go from a known power series to the function it describes.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Since some power series can give horrendously complex functions, no, there is no (elementary) way to go from a known power series to the function it describes.

That's the kind of answer I'm looking for (but didn't want to be the case).

Are there any examples of someone reversing an expansion to get a formula?
 
dst said:
That's the kind of answer I'm looking for (but didn't want to be the case).

Are there any examples of someone reversing an expansion to get a formula?

There are some examples, but they are often "textbook" problems designed to have solutions. As someone already explained, there is no general method. However, if you look up generating functions and power series you will find plenty of examples.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K