Can Farnsworth Fusors create fusion energy like the sun?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of creating fusion energy similar to that produced by the sun, particularly through the use of Farnsworth Fusors. Participants explore the differences between nuclear power and solar fusion, the challenges of replicating the sun's conditions, and personal experiments related to fusion energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why nuclear power relies on elements like plutonium while the sun primarily uses hydrogen and helium for energy production.
  • There is a distinction made between chemical reactions and nuclear fusion, with emphasis on the proton-proton cycle and C-N-O cycle in the sun.
  • One participant proposes creating a smaller version of the sun to solve energy problems, having started experiments with water splitting to separate hydrogen and oxygen.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of achieving the high pressures necessary for fusion, which are present in the sun but not replicable with current technology.
  • Some participants note that while producing fusion in a home lab is possible with devices like Farnsworth Fusors, the efficiency of such devices is extremely low, yielding minimal power output compared to input.
  • There is mention of ongoing research into fusion power, highlighting the difficulties faced in achieving a sustained fusion reaction similar to that of the sun.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some agreeing on the challenges of replicating solar fusion, while others remain optimistic about personal experimentation. There is no consensus on the feasibility of creating a smaller version of the sun or the effectiveness of Farnsworth Fusors in producing usable energy.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the conditions required for fusion, the efficiency of current experimental setups, and the differences in energy production methods between the sun and human-made systems.

keigh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
questiion guys..

why nuclear power uses diff kind of elements such as plutonium?
while sun has only two elements two produce energy.

i ask that question because i am curious on how energy is created trough atom fusion.
while studying the basic principle of chemical reaction of the SUN, the two main elements that created a huge amount of energy is hydrogen and helium.

my conclusion is maybe i can create an energy if i do the same as the sun's chemical reaction.
do you think this could be possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
keigh said:
questiion guys..

why nuclear power uses diff kind of elements such as plutonium?
while sun has only two elements two produce energy.

i ask that question because i am curious on how energy is created trough atom fusion.
while studying the basic principle of chemical reaction of the SUN, the two main elements that created a huge amount of energy is hydrogen and helium.

my conclusion is maybe i can create an energy if i do the same as the sun's chemical reaction.
do you think this could be possible?
Fissile isotopes such as U-233, U-235 and Pu-239 release energy (~205 MeV/fission) upon fissioning in response to neutron absorption.

The sun and most other stars produce energy via fusion, a process in which lighter elements, primarily hydrogen in the form of protons, combine into heavier elements.

The sun does not produce energy by chemical reactions. The sun is sustained by fusion by virture of the proton-proton cycle, and a little by fusion of protons in the C-N-O cycle.
 
Astronuc said:
The sun does not produce energy by chemical reactions. The sun is sustained by fusion by virture of the proton-proton cycle, and a little by fusion of protons in the C-N-O cycle.

And this happens in the sun because of the huge pressures in its interior caused by gravity.

There is certainly plenty of research going on into fusion power, but it's very difficult (much more difficult than making an unstable nucleus split) and it remains to be seen if it can be made practical.
 
what if we do make a smaller version of sun?
i mean if we follow the concept of C-N-O cycle of the sun then we can solve the problem of electricity. because here in our country a few days a go a black out was occurred.
with my simple idea it will change everything.
actually I've done my first step, by water splitting I've separated hydrogen atom and oxygen. my problem is how to contain the hydrohen atom.

i've also created my own procedures and collected some materials.

coz i would like to do some experiments.
 
Physicists and engineers have been trying for decades to duplicate the energy production method of the sun in a sustained reaction, so far without success. It is most certainly not a trivial undertaking and there isn't anything you can do on your own that will come anywhere close to it.
 
thank you very much for those who offered their knowledge.
how ever, i have to continue this and think a possible solution on how to do this idea.
no one knows.. maybe if i already reach my limitation and my ideas are not working then that would be the time to stop.

tahnk you very much.
 
keigh said:
what if we do make a smaller version of sun?
i mean if we follow the concept of C-N-O cycle of the sun then we can solve the problem of electricity. because here in our country a few days a go a black out was occurred.
with my simple idea it will change everything.
actually I've done my first step, by water splitting I've separated hydrogen atom and oxygen. my problem is how to contain the hydrohen atom.

i've also created my own procedures and collected some materials.

coz i would like to do some experiments.
As the_house indicated, the conditions within the sun produce high pressures, well beyond the capability of any man-made engineered material. We simply cannot replicated the conditions within the sun in order to sustain a fusion reaction.

As Russ indicated, we've been trying to perfect fusion for energy production for several decades now. We don't do proton fusion, but fusion of other hydrogen isotopes, deuterons and tritons, and sometime deuterons with Li nuclei. We can make thermonuclear weapons, but that is not controlled, nor is it practical for energy production.

An ideal fusion system would produce no neutrons. Beside d + Li6, fusion of p + B11 would be ideal. However, these reactions require high temperatures, and in conjunction with reasonable high nuclear densities, pressure is a problem. The yields are too low to practical with current systems.
 
russ_watters said:
Physicists and engineers have been trying for decades to duplicate the energy production method of the sun in a sustained reaction, so far without success. It is most certainly not a trivial undertaking and there isn't anything you can do on your own that will come anywhere close to it.

Producing fusion in the home lab is actually quite easy if one uses a Farnsworth fusor-type device. I've seen it done myself several times, high-school kids are doing it. A friend of mine, Doug Coulter, see: http://www.coultersmithing.com/ has a fusion reactor in his lab.

The problem with these types of fusion reactors is the efficiencies are very low. If you put 1000 watts of power into the reactor, at best, you get about 1000.0000001 watts of power out, most of the input power is turned into heat. The actual power from fusion is measured in microwatts or less.

As Russ points out, this isn't "anywhere close" to what is being done in the sun. In a fusor, the fusion ions (deuterium) are accelerated towards each other using a high-voltage (usually 30kV to 50kV or higher) electric field. Some of the ions hit each other with sufficient energy to cause a fusion reaction.

In the sun, the energy is supplied using heat generated by the pressure of the gravity of the elements in the sun itself. This type of fusion (fusion through heat and pressure) has only been created in very expensive labs with extensive government funding.

So if you want to duplicate what's being done in the sun, you're best bet is to get a Ph.D and join a big government lab. If you want to experiment with fusion, I suggest looking into electrostatic fusion and Farnsworth Fusors in particular.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K