B Can frame dragging do this?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ankit Doshi
  • Start date Start date
Ankit Doshi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I want to share a thought from Gravtiy probe B satellite experiment . Can frame dragging , a rotating object puncture the space time Fabric ? i am not a physicist

just for imagination - If we put a satellite at L1 point ,which has equilibrium in gravity

In this satellite there are 2 sets of rotating spheres . In 1st set there are 2 spheres rotating very near to each other , with optimum RPM and Mass , but rotating in opposite direction to each other . 1st sphere in clockwise 2nd in anti clockwise or other direction .

2nd set of spheres is at few feet distance from the 1st set . 2nd set also has the 2 rotating spheres like 1st one.

if spheres of both sets touch the partner sphere at the exact same time , can it create a small worm hole between them ? when spheres of both sets are rotating and creating frame dragging , and entangling gravity lines , when the spheres touch each other for a second , can they puncture space time fabric ? 1 set of spheres is not enough because worm hole needs 2 ends .

Either above idea is good , or it is total foolish idea , but i just want to put this idea in universe , if anyone finds it interesting.

And everything doesn't have to be created hard way , they also found a easy way to create diamonds by CVD technic without high pressure and temperature.

i know above thought is a foolish idea , but still wanted to share it

Thanks

Ankit Doshi
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ankit Doshi said:
if spheres of both sets touch the partner sphere at the exact same time , can it create a small worm hole between them ?
No.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, Nugatory and hutchphd
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top