Can Gauss Curvature Be Zero on a Genus 2 Surface?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Gauss
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Gauss-Bonnet theorem confirms that the Gauss curvature of a closed orientable surface of genus 2 cannot be identically zero. The Euler characteristic for such a surface is calculated as 2 - 2(2) = -2, leading to a total Gauss curvature of -4π. Since the integral of zero is zero, it contradicts the established total curvature, thereby proving that the Gauss curvature cannot be identically zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem
  • Familiarity with Euler characteristic calculations
  • Knowledge of Gaussian curvature concepts
  • Basic principles of differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem in different topological contexts
  • Explore examples of surfaces with varying genus and their curvature properties
  • Learn about the relationship between curvature and topology in differential geometry
  • Investigate applications of the Euler characteristic in geometric analysis
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, particularly those specializing in differential geometry, topology, and geometric analysis, as well as students seeking to deepen their understanding of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem and its applications.

Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
Use the gauss bonnet theorem to show that the gauss curvature of a closed orientable surface of genus 2 cannot be identically zero

euler characteristic is 2-2(2)=-2 so total gauss curvature is equal to -4pi. The integral of zero is zero and not -4pi so gauss curvature is not identically zero. Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Poirot said:
Use the gauss bonnet theorem to show that the gauss curvature of a closed orientable surface of genus 2 cannot be identically zero

euler characteristic is 2-2(2)=-2 so total gauss curvature is equal to -4pi. The integral of zero is zero and not -4pi so gauss curvature is not identically zero. Is this right?

That's right.

To explain this more clearly to those who end up at this thread:

The Gauss-Bonnet theorem states that for a compact, 2-dimensional manifold $$M$$, with gaussian curvature $$K$$, whose boundary $$∂M$$ has geodesic curvature $$k_g$$, we have the equality:
$$\int_M K\;dA+\int_{\partial M}k_g\;ds=2\pi\chi(M)$$
where $$\chi(M)$$ is the Euler Characteristic of the surface $$M$$.

In the case of a closed, orientable surface of genus 2, we would state that the surface has no boundary, and that its Euler Characteristic is given by $$2-2g=-2$$. Thus, the Gauss-Bonnet theorem states that
$$\int_M K\;dA=-4\pi$$

Clearly, if $$K=0$$ everywhere (that is, if K is "identically zero"), then the integral on the left would be the integral of zero over some surface, which would have to be zero. We conclude by contradiction that this cannot be the case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K