MHB Can (I-A)^{-1} Be Expressed as a Series When A^4 = 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter delgeezee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the inverse of the matrix (I - A) can be expressed as a finite series when A raised to the fourth power equals zero. It is shown that (I - A)^{-1} equals I + A + A^2 + A^3 under the condition A^4 = 0. Additionally, if A raised to the power of (n+1) equals zero, the inverse can be represented as a series I + A + A^2 + ... + A^n. The proof involves verifying that multiplying (I - A) by the series yields the identity matrix. This confirms the validity of the series representation for the inverse in both cases.
delgeezee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Let A be a square matrix,

a) show that $$(I-A)^{-1}= I + A + A^2 + A^3 if A^4 = 0$$

b) show that $$(I-A)^{-1}= I + A + A^2+...+A^n $$ if $$
A^{n+1}= 0$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: polynomial problem proof?

B is the inverse of A iff AB = BA = I
so
try
(I -A )( I + A + A^2 + A^3) = I-A + A - A^2 + A^2 - A^3 + A^3 - A^4 = I - A^4 = I
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
942
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K