Can I be a good theorist without a degree in math?

  • Context: Studying 
  • Thread starter Thread starter garra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    math Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of having a degree in mathematics to be an effective theoretical physicist. Participants explore the educational backgrounds of notable physicists, the relevance of formal credentials, and the potential for success in theoretical physics without a traditional math degree.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether a "math physics degree" is essential for effectiveness in theoretical physics, citing examples of successful physicists like Roger Penrose who have strong math backgrounds.
  • Others argue that most theoretical physicists hold degrees in physics, suggesting that a physics degree may be sufficient.
  • A participant mentions that seeking credentials should not distract from the actual knowledge and skills needed for research.
  • There are references to notable theorists with non-traditional educational paths, such as Edward Witten and Freeman Dyson, highlighting that exceptional cases exist.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the relevance of historical examples in the context of modern theoretical physics.
  • There is a humorous exchange about defining terms like "excellent," "theorist," and "math degree," indicating differing perspectives on what constitutes success in the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a math degree is necessary for becoming a good theorist. Multiple competing views remain regarding the importance of formal education versus practical knowledge and skills.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal experiences and opinions rather than established facts, and there is a notable emphasis on the subjective nature of success in theoretical physics.

garra
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I wondered this when i saw that Robert Penrose its a physicist and a mathematician.
If i dont do a math physics degree I wont be effective?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what a "math physics degree" is, but most theoretical physicists have degrees in physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and berkeman
garra said:
I wondered this when i saw that Robert Penrose its a physicist and a mathematician.
If i dont do a math physics degree I wont be effective?
How hard do you think it would be to Google something like "who are the current leaders in theoretical physics" and then look up whether or not they have a degree in math? I did that and the result is easily obtained and definitive.

If you are going to go into science, you should learn how to do research.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, robphy, vanhees71 and 1 other person
phinds said:
How hard do you think it would be to Google something like "who are the current leaders in theoretical physics" and then look up whether or not they have a degree in math? I
While I agree with your point, here is one of thise cases where Google bobbles it. About a third of "the current leaders in theoretical physics" are dead,
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and vanhees71
Vanadium 50 said:
I don't know what a "math physics degree" is, but most theoretical physicists have degrees in physics.
I had a friend who was studying physics and math at uni. I was worried that my only physics degree wouldn't be enough
 
Don't get too distracted by seeking credentials (e.g., this degree, that degree, this certification, that certification). Figure out what you want to do, see what you need to know to do it, and start learning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: robphy, vanhees71, FactChecker and 4 others
garra said:
I had a friend who was studying physics and math at uni. I was worried that my only physics degree wouldn't be enough
Which totally avoids any response to my statement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Vanadium 50 said:
While I agree with your point, here is one of thise cases where Google bobbles it. About a third of "the current leaders in theoretical physics" are dead,
Yeah, but before they died, they didn't have math degrees :oldlaugh:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd and vanhees71
phinds said:
Yeah, but before they died, they didn't have math degrees
Nor after, for that matter.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd, vanhees71, FactChecker and 2 others
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
Nor after, for that matter.
Based on a quick Google search, many universities have procedures for awarding posthumous degrees. 🤔
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, FactChecker and Hornbein
  • #11
Why not? I know of a few faculty awarded tenure after brain death.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42, phinds and vanhees71
  • #12
garra said:
I had a friend who was studying physics and math at uni. I was worried that my only physics degree wouldn't be enough
Having a formal double major or a major/minor in Physics and Math is less important than the actual math courses you've taken.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and garra
  • #13
garra said:
I wondered this when i saw that Robert Penrose its a physicist and a mathematician.
If i dont do a math physics degree I wont be effective?

I think you mean Roger Penrose,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose ,
who has degrees in mathematics
and made substantial contributions in various fields involving mathematics, including general relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: garra
  • #14
robphy said:
I think you mean Roger Penrose,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose ,
who has degrees in mathematics
and made substantial contributions in various fields involving mathematics, including general relativity.
Yes. Im so embarrassed
 
  • #15
Haborix said:
Don't get too distracted by seeking credentials (e.g., this degree, that degree, this certification, that certification). Figure out what you want to do, see what you need to know to do it, and start learning.

Here are two theorists with non-traditional degree paths. (There are likely many others.)
Of course, these two are exceptional.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Witten
Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in history and minor in linguistics from Brandeis University in 1971
PhD in physics from Princeton in 1976

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_Dyson
https://www.iop.org/physics-community/obituaries/freeman-dyson
https://www.ias.edu/sns/dyson
BA degree in mathematics from Cambridge in 1945
[no PhD]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: martinbn and Demystifier
  • #16
Paul Dirac:
- electrical engineering degree 1921
- mathematics degree 1923
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: martinbn
  • #17
It seems that it would be easier to list the physicists with a physics degree.
 
  • #19
Actually, during my PhD I had a collegue who switched after his bachelor in Engineering to a one year master in theoretical physics and wrote a highly technical PhD thesis on a topic related to string theory.

Also, I ended up being an excellent theorist without a math degree 😜
 
  • #20
haushofer said:
Also, I ended up being an excellent theorist without a math degree 😜
Define ”excellent”, ”theorist”, and ”math degree” 🤣
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
  • #21
Well, not to boast, but I'm theoretically excellent at maths, to a degree, myself.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd and berkeman
  • #22
Examples from 50+ years ago are not so relevant for the times of today. The time between today and when Dyson got his PhD is about the same as the time between when Dyson got his PhD and Maxwell.

As for Ed Witten, many people come to PF thinking they are the next Ed Witten. Not so many actually are.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gwnorth
  • #23
Vanadium 50 said:
The time between today and when Dyson got his PhD
Dyson never got a PhD.
 
  • #25
Orodruin said:
Define ”excellent”, ”theorist”, and ”math degree” 🤣
I'll probably end up being disappointed, so let me keep my illusions 😎
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K