Can I call myself a physicist yet?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter flatmaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of when an individual can rightfully call themselves a physicist, exploring various perspectives on qualifications, professional identity, and societal perceptions. Participants share their educational backgrounds, experiences in academia, and differing opinions on the significance of titles in the field of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a PhD is necessary to call oneself a physicist, while others argue that being a graduate student or working in related fields may suffice.
  • One participant expresses that they would only consider themselves a physicist if they were employed in a research capacity at a national lab.
  • Another participant mentions the importance of context in defining what a physicist is, noting that titles can vary in meaning depending on the audience.
  • Several participants share personal anecdotes about their experiences and feelings regarding their identities as physicists or related roles, including teaching and research assistant positions.
  • There is a humorous exchange about the social implications of having a PhD, including a light-hearted comment about using the title for restaurant reservations.
  • One participant critiques the thread as self-serving, questioning the motivations behind discussing personal achievements in the context of calling oneself a physicist.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the criteria for calling oneself a physicist, with multiple competing views presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying definitions of what constitutes a physicist, highlighting the influence of academic status, job titles, and personal beliefs on their self-identification. There are also references to the informal nature of titles in different professional contexts.

flatmaster
Messages
497
Reaction score
2
I have my BS in Physics with a chem minor. I've done two years of gradschool at UAH. I'll be back to classes in the fall at UAB Huntsville. At Auburn, I was awarded TA of the year from the dept. So how about it? Can I call myself a physicist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can call yourself modest.

Sarcasm aside, do you do physics for a living?
 
Someone told me you can only call yourself a physicist when you have your PHD. Then of course there's a professor of mine who said we could call ourselves physicists when we were taking upper division physics courses. Who knows. If you're still in school, you're a student, that's for sure. If you're unemployed, you're a bum. If you work as a physicist, I guess you shoudl call yourself a physicist!
 
Pengwuino said:
Someone told me you can only call yourself a physicist when you have your PHD. Then of course there's a professor of mine who said we could call ourselves physicists when we were taking upper division physics courses. Who knows. If you're still in school, you're a student, that's for sure. If you're unemployed, you're a bum. If you work as a physicist, I guess you shoudl call yourself a physicist!

You should not even be allowed into a physics classroom, let alone calling yourself a physicist.
 
Cyrus said:
You should not even be allowed into a physics classroom, let alone calling yourself a physicist.

I hate you.

That professor also said to get a PHD so you can say 'Dr.' when you're making a table reservation at a restaurant. It sounds very cool.
 
Pengwuino said:
If you're unemployed, you're a bum.

Under this definition, I'm a bum. However bum and physicist and not orthogonal.
 
Pengwuino said:
I hate you.

That professor also said to get a PHD so you can say 'Dr.' when you're making a table reservation at a restaurant. It sounds very cool.

If I had a PhD, I'd tell people to call me Cyrus. The title isn't to impress people working at restaurants.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You said "orthogonal."

You physicist, you.
 
ok.. I think I'm a physiscist
 
  • #10
yeah, I don't know.. my prophessors and colleagues think I'm way good at physics, but seriously I'll give myself 80% [though, I used to be on top of my class], right now I'm a research assistant, and applying for a job at my local university [teaching assistant], I’m expecting to start after summer, but I wouldn’t call myself a physicist unless I invent something really rocks the world…high expectations :biggrin:
 
  • #11
drizzle said:
yeah, I don't know.. my prophessors and colleagues think I'm way good at physics, but seriously I'll give myself 80% [though, I used to be on top of my class], right now I'm a research assistant, and applying for a job at my local university [teaching assistant], I’m expecting to start after summer, but I wouldn’t call myself a physicist unless I invent something really rocks the world…high expectations :biggrin:

It's spelled professors. Why would you go from an RA to a TA? That's a step down, not up.
 
  • #12
Cyrus said:
It's spelled professors. Why would you go from an RA to a TA? That's a step down, not up.

thanks for the correction, I don’t know how things work where you live, but here I have to go though all steps if I want to major in physics as an assisted professor, you see I didn’t teach after graduation, but I start my master study after 2 yrs [thanks to my GPA and professors recommendations] while I’m still studying master my advisor took me on as a research assistant [that’s temporarily on a couple of researches], got it!
 
  • #13
drizzle said:
thanks for the correction, I don’t know how things work where you live, but here I have to go though all steps if I want to major in physics as an assisted professor, you see I didn’t teach after graduation, but I start my master study after 2 yrs [thanks to my GPA and professors recommendations] while I’m still studying master my advisor took me on as a research assistant [that’s temporarily on a couple of researches], got it!

What is an 'assisted professor': are you trying to become a professor? I think I understand about 60% of what you write.
 
  • #14
Cyrus said:
What is an 'assisted professor': are you trying to become a professor? I think I understand about 60% of what you write.

that's enough for you:wink: you can't handle more than that!
 
  • #15
drizzle said:
that's enough for you:wink: you can't handle more than that!

FYI: I generally don't like it when people I don't know post responses to me as if I were a close buddy. I don't know you that well.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Cyrus said:
FYI: I generally don't like it when people I don't know post responses to me as if I were a close buddy. I don't know you that well.

lick your elbow! * you are way far from being a close buddy






* [just in case you asks cause I don’t want to post replies again] it’s a saying I learned, it means if you could lick your elbow then what you think is possible, but it isn't
 
  • #17
I have my Ph.D. in physics and my job title contains the word "physics", but I still cringe when my husband says I'm a physicist. I just teach physics at a university. I guess I'd only think of myself as a physicist if I was employed at a national lab and was classified as a full time research physicist under some gs grade... or something similar. Since that's not the case, I think I'd be doing hack job if one thought of me as a "physicist".
 
  • #18
It depends entirely how you look at it. The first definition in Websters is "a specialist in physics". In a room full of post-docs doing fundamental research, "specialist" means one thing, but for the average person, including the majority of working non-scientific professionals, it means something else entirely.

When I finished college with a BS in Physics, I began doing industrial designs that required that I have general liability and professional errors and omissions insurance. Some kind of title was required for me that was representitive but not misleading. "Graduate Physicist" was finally the language chosen.
 
  • #19
Ivan Seeking said:
It depends entirely how you look at it. The first definition in Websters is "a specialist in physics". In a room full of post-docs doing fundamental research, "specialist" means one thing, but for the average person, including the majority of working non-scientific professionals, it means something else entirely.

When I finished college with a BS in Physics, I began doing industrial designs that required insurance. Some kind of title was required for me that was representitive but not misleading. Graduate physicist was finally the language chosen.

"Design Engineer"

Anyways, it doesn't matter because I think the thread is self serving and pointless. Why not just make a thread that says I got an award as being a TA, everyone clap for me. I honestly see no other point to this thread than that.
 
  • #20
Cyrus said:
"Design Engineer"

I studied physics, not engineering. They knew what I was doing.
 
  • #21
physics girl phd said:
I have my Ph.D. in physics and my job title contains the word "physics", but I still cringe when my husband says I'm a physicist. I just teach physics at a university. I guess I'd only think of myself as a physicist if I was employed at a national lab and was classified as a full time research physicist under some gs grade... or something similar. Since that's not the case, I think I'd be doing hack job if one thought of me as a "physicist".
Though I started on that track, I never ended up getting a degree in Chemical Engineering. A few years later, when I found myself working as a process chemist in a $$$$$ pulp mill, I had no problem saying "chemist" when people asked what I did. When fractional percentages of improvements in the efficiency of that mill could pay my salary for years (even decades) I felt no compunction in claiming the title. I beat out a newly-minted CE for my position though I had no degree, and we became close friends after his hire a year later.
 
  • #22
drizzle said:
lick your elbow! * you are way far from being a close buddy






* [just in case you asks cause I don’t want to post replies again] it’s a saying I learned, it means if you could lick your elbow then what you think is possible, but it isn't


Then why do you pm me and respond to my posts as if we are? It's out of place. Again, I don't understand half of what you're saying.
 
  • #23
Ivan Seeking said:
I studied physics, not engineering. They knew what I was doing.

I know you studied physics, but you weren't hired to do physics, were you?

My point is that physicists are hired to do physics.

A physicist can be hired to do something that's non related to physics, but at that point your no longer a physicist.
 
  • #24
turbo-1 said:
Though I started on that track, I never ended up getting a degree in Chemical Engineering. A few years later, when I found myself working as a process chemist in a $$$$$ pulp mill, I had no problem saying "chemist" when people asked what I did. When fractional percentages of improvements in the efficiency of that mill could pay my salary for years (even decades) I felt no compunction in claiming the title. I beat out a newly-minted CE for my position though I had no degree, and we became close friends after his hire a year later.

That's because you were actually doing what a chemist does.
 
  • #25
Cyrus said:
I know you studied physics, but you weren't hired to do physics, were you?

I was being paid to use what I had learned. Also, this [my first application for insurance] was for a project funded by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. I was self-employed.

My point is that physicists are hired to do physics.

What is "doing physics"? I use the physics that I studied every day. If you mean research, then that would be a research physicist.

A physicist can be hired to do something that's non related to physics, but at that point your no longer a physicist.

I was being asked what qualifies me to do the work I was insuring. The real answer is that I can figure out what I need to know because, and only because of my physics degree.
 
  • #26
Cyrus said:
Then why do you pm me and respond to my posts as if we are? It's out of place. Again, I don't understand half of what you're saying.


urrrrrrrrrrrgh... you really want to piss me off
when did I do that! are you drunk!

what! the post about the other thread days ago! was 1 post and I asks you NOT to reply to it!


and hey, you are not embarrassing me

if you mean it, why don't you ignore my posts and quit being picky about it!
 
  • #27
Cyrus said:
I know you studied physics, but you weren't hired to do physics, were you?

My point is that physicists are hired to do physics.

A physicist can be hired to do something that's non related to physics, but at that point your no longer a physicist.

Everything has its root in physics :smile: So you can say it!

Then again does that mean anyone doing any scientific/engineering job can say they're a physicist... hmmmm, i don't like where this is going.

Point is, get a job with "physicist" in the title just to be on the safe side.
 
  • #28
Pengwuino said:
Everything has its root in physics :smile: So you can say it!

Then again does that mean anyone doing any scientific/engineering job can say they're a physicist... hmmmm, i don't like where this is going.

Point is, get a job with "physicist" in the title just to be on the safe side.

True...my secretary's job is rooted in physics, after all!

I have a lowly little BS in physics, currently employed to to chemistry (long story). I definitely don't think of myself as a physicist.

But I have always been under the impression that to be called a physicist, you need a PhD and several years of research and publishing. Very different from an engineer, a chemist, a nurse, or a forester.

Getting a BS in physics is not like training for a vocation.
 
  • #29
Pengwuino said:
Everything has its root in physics :smile: So you can say it!

Then again does that mean anyone doing any scientific/engineering job can say they're a physicist... hmmmm, i don't like where this is going..

No, because they didn't specialize in physics. Duh!
 
  • #30
I think you are all missing the point. There are times when one is asked for a title related to one's education. You have to say something. How you wish to define the meaning of "specialist" from there is arbitrary.

Also, there is a difference between a physics grad and an engineering grad. In fact I learned how to capitalize it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 209 ·
7
Replies
209
Views
19K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
9K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K