Can I Get a Masters Degree in 2 Years?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of obtaining a master's degree in engineering after completing a bachelor's degree in a different field, particularly focusing on transitions from physics and applied mathematics to engineering disciplines. Participants explore the prerequisites, challenges, and experiences related to such academic pathways.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares that a friend completed a B.S. in physics and a master's in mechanical engineering in six years, questioning the ease of transitioning between separate majors.
  • Another participant argues that transitioning from physics to engineering is feasible due to the foundational knowledge in math and physics, but acknowledges it may be harder than moving from an engineering bachelor's to a master's.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of lab experience and specific engineering knowledge when transitioning from applied mathematics to electrical engineering.
  • A participant inquires about the differences in admission processes between master's and PhD programs, suggesting that the criteria may not be uniformly applied.
  • There is a mention that while a higher GPA is typically required for PhD programs, the difference in admission difficulty may not be significant, with some suggesting a smooth transition from MS to PhD is possible.
  • Another participant challenges the notion of a straightforward transition, citing experiences in their mathematics department that differ from the general perspective.
  • A question is posed regarding the viability of moving from a Chemistry BA to an MS in engineering, contingent on having taken relevant courses in mechanics and physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the ease of transitioning between disciplines, with some asserting it is feasible while others highlight significant challenges. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific requirements and experiences related to different academic paths.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various prerequisites such as lab experience, specific coursework, and the importance of foundational knowledge, but do not reach a consensus on what constitutes adequate preparation for a master's program in engineering.

Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
Masters degree?

One of my friends has a B.S in physics, and a masters in mechanical engineering. He did it all in 6 years.

Now surely an appreciable amount of physics relates to mechanical engineering, but is it typically that easy to complete another "separate" major like that?

If I do 4 years of applied mathematics, could I then get a masters degree in say electrical engineering in only 2 years?

It just doesn't seem feasible. Maybe I am missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know about applied math, but physics --> engineering is very much do-able. You don't learn all the specifics that an engineer would in his/her classes, but you know the math and you know the underlying physics anyway. It's just a matter of someone telling you and you will probably understand at that point.

But, of course, a physics BS going for an engineering MS isn't on the same level as an engineering BS going for an engineering MS. It WILL be harder for you, but do-able.

I can't say with applied math, though. You'd certainly have all the math down, but how much lab experience do you have? Taking measurements, understanding data and uncertainties, etc., is all very valuable for an engineer. Moreover, how much physics do you understand? If you don't know the engineering itself, you could at least understand where it comes from (physics). If you don't know either, it will also be pretty hard.
 
Depends what you've taken. have you taken physics courses and/or any circuit theory? EE's also know how to program. Talk to a prospective department
 
a bit off topic but is it easier to get into a masters program than a PhD one? I normally don't see separate procedures/application process but why judge both using the same criteria?
 
Yes, the PhD requires a higher GPA. But I really don't think the difference is THAT significant. If you get into the MS, there's a very good chance for you to just shift over into a PHD instead.
 
Cyrus said:
Yes, the PhD requires a higher GPA. But I really don't think the difference is THAT significant. If you get into the MS, there's a very good chance for you to just shift over into a PHD instead.

Not true in my maths department.
 
What about a Chemistry BA to MS in engineering? What if you have taken as an undergrad in addition to the chem major: Mechanics, E&M, Modern as well as calculus through DiffEQ and Linear Algebra? In my school I think that's enough for a physics minor if you include the first year of intro.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K