MHB Can I Solve for c by Replacing b with a Value Greater Than 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
mathland
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I replace b with any value greater than 0 and then solve for c. Right?

FB_IMG_1612321193999.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you get when you expand the LHS and equate the resulting terms with the corresponding terms in the RHS of the given equation
 
Greg said:
What do you get when you expand the LHS and equate the resulting terms with the corresponding terms in the RHS of the given equation

Ok. I will do as you suggested and be back.
 
It's been 7 months now! Are you still working on it?

For those who were wondering, there are two solutions.
(2x- b)(7x+ b)= 14x^2+ 2bx- 7bx- b^2= 14x^3- 5bx- b^2. That is to be equal to 14x^2- cx- 16.

So we must have -5b= -c and -b^2= -16. b^2= 16 so b= 4 or b= -4.
If b= 4, -5b= -20= -c so c= 20.
If b= -4, -5b= 20= -c so c= -20.

Check:
(2x- 4)(7x+ 4)= 14x^2+ 8x- 28x- 16= 14x^2- 20x- 16.
(2x+ 4)(7x- 4)= 14x^2- 8x+ 28x- 16= 14x^2+ 20x- 16.
 
Beer soaked comment follows.
Country Boy said:
It's been 7 months now! Are you still working on it?
...
He's been banned permanently.
 
I'll bet I could drink that cask of wine in less than 20 days!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top