Can I Test Lightboxes for UV Rays?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Frozen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rays Sleep Test Uv
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the safety of lightboxes used for treating Delayed Sleep Phase Disorder, specifically concerning their potential UV ray emissions. Participants explore methods for testing these lightboxes to ensure they do not emit harmful UV radiation, while also addressing concerns about the reliability of manufacturer claims.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the UV emissions from lightboxes, despite manufacturer claims that they do not emit UV rays.
  • Another participant suggests various methods to test for UV emissions, including using UV-reactive materials and photodiodes, while noting the need for filters to block visible light.
  • A participant mentions that while acrylic sheets can block residual UV, quantitative measurements may require expensive equipment.
  • Concerns are raised about the ambiguity of the term "cancer" and the complexity of its causes, with a suggestion to clarify the specific type of cancer in question.
  • Participants discuss the limitations of achieving absolute certainty in scientific measurements, advocating for a high degree of confidence instead.
  • Suggestions include contacting reputable manufacturers for detailed information about UV testing and considering the quality of the lightbox based on online reviews.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the range of UV wavelengths and their varying exposure risks.
  • Another participant recommends consulting dermatologists or museums for additional information on UV exposure monitoring.
  • A participant points out the challenges of finding local experts or resources in rural areas, suggesting that online research may be necessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement on various points, particularly regarding the interpretation of cancer risks and the reliability of manufacturer claims. There is no consensus on the best method for testing lightboxes or the adequacy of available information.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of measuring UV emissions and the potential variability in lightbox quality. There are unresolved questions about the adequacy of testing methods and the definitions of cancer-related risks.

Frozen
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I suffer from Delayed Sleep Phase Disorder: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_sleep_phase_disorder

I've been taking sleeping pills for it for years (without them, I'd never be up in time for work) but have recently become concerned about adverse consequences of long-term use, mainly increased risk of dementia. I've been reading about lightboxes as an alternative treatment: http://www.maplin.co.uk/p/maplin-10000-lux-full-size-sad-light-a20hw

I'm worried about using them because of UV rays (cancer runs in my family). The manufacturers claim their lights don't emit UV rays, but I'm naturally mistrusting. How can I test the lightboxes to be absolutely sure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are various things that react to UV, beads, various fluorescent dyes, UV photodiodes, ...
Depending on the sensitivity, you might also need a filter that blocks visible light (especially for photodiodes).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frozen
Frozen said:
The manufacturers claim their lights don't emit UV rays, but I'm naturally mistrusting. How can I test the lightboxes to be absolutely sure?

You are right to be concerned- the light sources in that box you posted are fluorescent bulbs. A sheet of acrylic (1/4" is plenty thick) will block any residual UV. If you want to make quantitative measurements, tho, it's going to be expensive and time-consuming.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frozen
1."cancer runs in my family". I have no idea what that means. Cancer is not a disease. It is a term used to describe a multitude of diseases with multiple causes and a multitude of genetic susceptibility factors. But, perhaps you meant "skin cancer runs in my family".

2. "to be absolutely sure" As a (hopefully) gentle reminder of what you (should have) learned in secondary school: if you want absolute certainty, find a religion - science is not in the absolute truth business. But, perhaps you meant "with a high degree of confidence". In which case, I suggest you contact a manufacturer with a good reputation and ask them. If they claim that their device emits zero UV, you should first challenge them on that (since it can't be "absolutely" true - but it can be below limits of detection and register 0 on a particular measuring device). If they aren't able to (might take some time to find an engineer or technologist who knows what they're talking about) give you a satisfactory answer, then move on. This approach requires you to learn more about what an acceptable daily dose of UV is, and a lot about calibration of measuring instrumentation. I'm a bit concerned that you think that "UV" is one thing rather than a range of electromagnetic wavelengths spanning the range between violet light and x-rays, with DIFFERENT exposure risks.

3. A 30 second Google search on "UV light meter" located dozens of instruments for sale between US$40 and US$1000. A quality instrument will state at least two things: range of wavelengths it is sensitive to and precision of measurement. The cheaper instruments will only measure watts (or similar measure) totaled over its range of sensitivity. You can improve this by buying filters, but good ones aren't cheap. There are much more expensive instruments which will measure the intensity of the UV light's spectrum, usually UVA/B or UVC are done with different sensors/instruments, as well as provide calibration standards. Actually, I'd not buy a meter unless the mfg provided me with the instrument's sensitivity (a graph of watts vs wavelength, for example). If they didn't have that, I'd suspect they were selling junk.

4. Why not ask a dermatologist? Also, museums are careful to monitor UV light exposure, you may be able to find out more from them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ogg said:
1."cancer runs in my family". I have no idea what that means. Cancer is not a disease. It is a term used to describe a multitude of diseases with multiple causes and a multitude of genetic susceptibility factors. But, perhaps you meant "skin cancer runs in my family".
http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/genetics
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and Frozen
Frozen said:
The manufacturers claim their lights don't emit UV rays, but I'm naturally mistrusting.

Online reviews of these lamps don't give a lot of confidence in their quality so your concern about the UV is justified. You could ask the manufacturer if each unit is tested for UV before it is shipped and how the UV is handled. If it's the plastic diffuser that's absorbing the UV, then as long as it's in place you might be assured. If they are relying on the phosphor coating in the bulbs, it's possible for bits of that to fall off during the manufacturing process, leaving bald spots.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Frozen
Thank you for your replies, folks. Some very useful stuff here - I've 'liked' a lot of posts.

ogg said:
1."cancer runs in my family". I have no idea what that means. Cancer is not a disease. It is a term used to describe a multitude of diseases with multiple causes and a multitude of genetic susceptibility factors. But, perhaps you meant "skin cancer runs in my family".

2. "to be absolutely sure" As a (hopefully) gentle reminder of what you (should have) learned in secondary school: if you want absolute certainty, find a religion - science is not in the absolute truth business. But, perhaps you meant "with a high degree of confidence".

4. Why not ask a dermatologist? Also, museums are careful to monitor UV light exposure, you may be able to find out more from them.

Thank you, berkeman. And ogg, if we're going to be needlessly pedantic (do you find that speaking to people like that gets you far in life?), maybe care to explain this to me if "cancer is not a disease": http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/adaptations/oncology/en/

I don't know any dermatologists and I live in a rural area so there aren't any museums around me.
 
Frozen said:
I don't know any dermatologists and I live in a rural area so there aren't any museums around me.
Google is your friend here. You can search for all the information you need about the regulations and standards associated with this stuff. You don't appear to have found an actual 'expert' on this topic, here on PF and you are in as good a position as any of us to access the information you need to reassure you.
I have to warn you that your quest may be more than a five minute job. There may be many blind alleys in your search and you may even need to subscribe (with money) to some of the sources. Look upon it as an Insurance Premium and then the occasional few Pounds / Dollars won't hurt so much.
PS You can probably be reassured about the quality of legitimate imports and locally made equipment if you live in one of the better informed countries of the World.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K