MHB Can I use the theorem for solving the given inequality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
|[3(x - 2)/4] + 4(x - 1)/3| ≤ 2

Can I use the following theorem?

If a > 0, then | u | < a if and only if -a < u < a
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
|[3(x - 2)/4] + 4(x - 1)/3| ≤ 2

Can I use the following theorem?

If a > 0, then | u | < a if and only if -a < u < a

yes
 
RTCNTC said:
|[3(x - 2)/4] + 4(x - 1)/3| ≤ 2

Can I use the following theorem?

If a > 0, then | u | < a if and only if -a < u < a

I'd begin by multiplying through by 12 to get:

$$\left|9(x-2)+16(x-1)\right|\le24$$

$$|25x-34|\le24$$

$$\left|x-\frac{34}{25}\right|\le\frac{24}{25}$$

Now it's obvious the solution is the set of all real numbers whose distance on the number line from 34/25 is less than or equal to 24/25...:D
 
Thank you. I can take it from here.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top