I Can I visualize O(3) \ SO(3) in some way?

BerriesAndCream
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Hello.

I know that a 3×3 orthogonal matrix with determinant = 1 (so a 3×3 special orthogonal matrix) is a rotation in 3D.
I was wondering if there is a 3×3 orthogonal matrix with determinant = –1 could be visualised in some way.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BerriesAndCream said:
Hello.

I know that a 3×3 orthogonal matrix with determinant = 1 (so a 3×3 special orthogonal matrix) is a rotation in 3D.
I was wondering if there is a 3×3 orthogonal matrix with determinant = –1 could be visualised in some way.

Thank you!
It can be visualized as a rotation of reflection.
 
  • Like
Likes BerriesAndCream and pines-demon
_
BerriesAndCream said:
Hello.

I know that a 3×3 orthogonal matrix with determinant = 1 (so a 3×3 special orthogonal matrix) is a rotation in 3D.
I was wondering if there is a 3×3 orthogonal matrix with determinant = –1 could be visualised in some way.

Thank you!
SO(3) is the group of rotations in 3D (no complex numbers). O(3) is the group of rotations and reflections, you can decompose any matrix O(3) as the product of a matrix in SO(3) and a reflection matrix.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and BerriesAndCream
thanks!
 
BerriesAndCream said:
Hello.

I know that a 3×3 orthogonal matrix with determinant = 1 (so a 3×3 special orthogonal matrix) is a rotation in 3D.
I was wondering if there is a 3×3 orthogonal matrix with determinant = –1 could be visualised in some way.

Thank you!
$$O(n) \cong SO(n) \rtimes O(1)$$
##O(1) \in \{1, -1\}## and ##\rtimes## is the semidirect product. So in some sense ##O(n)## can just be thought of like a direct product of ##SO(n)## and ##O(1)##. Geometrically as a manifold, Lie Group, ##O(n)## breaks into two components. ##SO(n)## is the connected component containing the Identity with ##det(A) = 1## and there is an isomorphic component that doesn't contain the identity with ##det(A) = -1##. So ##O(n)## can also be thought of as two copies of ##SO(n)##.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top