MHB Can improper integrals converge without absolute convergence?

Click For Summary
Improper integrals can converge without absolute convergence, as demonstrated by examples like the integral of sin(1/t)/t from 0 to 1, which converges while the integral of its absolute value diverges. The triangle inequality applies to integrals, establishing that the absolute value of an integral is less than or equal to the integral of the absolute value. For Riemann integrable functions, if f is integrable on [a, b], then |f| is also integrable, allowing for the application of these principles. Thus, while absolute convergence guarantees convergence, the reverse is not necessarily true for improper integrals.
alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
I know we have the following

$$ \big | \int^{b}_{a} f(t) \, dt \big | \leq \int^{b}_{a} |f(t)|\, dt$$

1- How to prove the inequality ,what are the conditions ?
2- Does it work for improper integrals ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZaidAlyafey said:
I know we have the following

$$ \big | \int^{b}_{a} f(t) \, dt \big | \leq \int^{b}_{a} |f(t)|\, dt$$

1- How to prove the inequality ,what are the conditions ?

If f(*) is Riemann integrable on (a,b) then the integral is... $$\int_{a}^{b} f(t)\ dt = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty\ , \text{max} \Delta t_{i} \rightarrow 0} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} f(t_{i})\ \Delta t_{i}\ (1)$$

For any finite sum is...

$$ |\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a_{i}| \le \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} |a_{i}|\ (2)$$

... and that proves the item 1...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
$$ |\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a_{i}| \le \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} |a_{i}|\ (2)$$

That is the triangle inequality on the elements of the sequence , right ?
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
That is the triangle inequality on the elements of the sequence , right ?

The so called 'triangle inequality' holds in general for vectors or complex numbers and extablishes that...

$$ |\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_{i}| \le \sum_{i=1}^{n} |a_{i}|\ (1) $$

See here...

Triangle Inequality -- from Wolfram MathWorld

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
And since the metric $d(x,y)=|x-y|$ is uniformly continuous, you are justified in passing to the limit for the integral.
 
Here's how I remember the outline of the proof.

If $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are integrable on $[a,b]$ (by which I mean Riemann integrable) and $f(x) \le g(x)$ for all $x \in [a,b]$, then $\int_{a}^{b} f(x) \ dx \le \int_{a}^{b} g(x) \ dx$.

Now if $f(x)$ is integrable on $[a,b]$, so is $|f(x)|$.

And $-|f(x)| \le f(x) \le |f(x)|$ for all $ x \in [a,b]$.

So $- \int_{a}^{b} |f(x)| \ dx \le \int_{a}^{b} f(x) \ dx \le \int_{a}^{b} |f(x)| \ dx $.
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
I know we have the following

$$ \big | \int^{b}_{a} f(t) \, dt \big | \leq \int^{b}_{a} |f(t)|\, dt$$

1- How to prove the inequality ,what are the conditions ?
2- Does it work for improper integrals ?

The answer to point 2 is slighly more complex. If we consider an improper integral in (a,b) where a is a singularity of f(*), then we intend...

$$\int_{a}^{b} f(t)\ dt = \lim_{x \rightarrow a+} \int_{x}^{b} f(t)\ dt\ (1)$$

The problem in such a case is that in can be that $\int_{a}^{b} f(t)\ dt$ converges and $\int_{a}^{b} |f(t)|\ dt$ diverges. An interesting example of such a case is...

$$\int_{0}^{1} \frac{\sin \frac {1}{t}}{t}\ dt\ (2)$$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
The answer to point 2 is slighly more complex. If we consider an improper integral in (a,b) where a is a singularity of f(*), then we intend...

$$\int_{a}^{b} f(t)\ dt = \lim_{x \rightarrow a+} \int_{x}^{b} f(t)\ dt\ (1)$$

The problem in such a case is that in can be that $\int_{a}^{b} f(t)\ dt$ converges and $\int_{a}^{b} |f(t)|\ dt$ diverges. An interesting example of such a case is...

$$\int_{0}^{1} \frac{\sin \frac {1}{t}}{t}\ dt\ (2)$$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

This is just like absolute convergence in series . If the integral absolutely convergent then it is convergent . If it is ''absolutely divergent" then the integral may or may not converge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K