Can Legislation Prevent Leaders from Misleading Congress into War?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chi Meson
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around strong negative sentiments toward former President George W. Bush and his administration, particularly regarding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Participants express frustration over the perceived lack of accountability and the emotional responses elicited by his policies. There is a debate about the appropriateness of outrage towards political leaders and whether such emotions can lead to rational decision-making. The conversation also touches on media influence, public apathy, and the challenges of finding unbiased news sources. Overall, the thread reflects deep dissatisfaction with Bush's legacy and the impact of his leadership on American society.
  • #31
LowlyPion said:
Only 4 more days and that's been 8 years too long as it is as far as I'm concerned.
After W was re-elected, I was lucky enough to stumble upon a t-shirt with Munch's Schrei entitled 3 more years at Dulles airport. I love this t-shirt, because the painting had just been recovered (by now you've guessed it was in 2006), and I think this masterpiece is quite appropriate to the reaction I had when he was re-elected.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f4/The_Scream.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
turbo-1 said:
Truly, a man without a conscience.
My deviant culture leads me to think that, with so little concern about human life, W does not deserve the title "man".
 
  • #33
humanino said:
My deviant culture leads me to think that, with so little concern about human life, W does not deserve the title "man".
When I look back on Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, et al, I have to compare them to Gollum. Single-minded, fixated, and amoral. My Precious...
 
  • #34
I was wondering if maybe this collegial discussion shouldn't be moved to Politics from General, as I think there may be a possibility that partisan rhetoric might emerge.
 
  • #35
LowlyPion said:
I was wondering if maybe this collegial discussion shouldn't be moved to Politics from General, as I think there may be a possibility that partisan rhetoric might emerge.
Not on my part, I can assure you. I am very conservative, and I usually vote split-tickets. My revulsion with the Bush administration lies entirely with their actions, and not with their putative party affiliation.
 
  • #36
turbo-1 said:
Not on my part, I can assure you. I am very conservative, and I usually vote split-tickets. My revulsion with the Bush administration lies entirely with their actions, and not with their putative party affiliation.

Nor on my part either, being as reserved as I am already in expressing my opinion.
 
  • #37
Good bye and my only wish is I never have to listen to you mangle the English language any further.

Unless, after an investigation, you get asked to the Hague to defend yourself against war crime charges.
 
  • #38
russ_watters said:
No, I didn't, Ivan, you did: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/apathy
I can't help but notice that you neglected to include the second definition, the one that Ivan was clearly using in his post.
Your Link said:
2. lack of interest in or concern for things that others find moving or exciting.
 
  • #39
It's funny that I think 99.99% of you are wrong. In fact, dead wrong. I think these remarks that 'he has no regard for human life', etc are WAYYY off the mark.

I honestly think this is a case of ignorance. He thought he could do a lot of honest to goodness GOOD in the middle east by spreading democracy, even if that meant covering his ears to what he didn't want to hear by nay-sayers in the government. It was his lack of of willingness to listen and think things through *before* setting out on them (with good intentions) that got him into the mess. And not putting his VP in check, letting Chenney have TOO much clout in DC and doing far too much behind the scenes with Haliburton in Iraq - a total disgrace.

I would argue its CHENNEY NOT BUSH that is the real evil guy in the WH.
 
  • #40
Cyrus said:
It's funny that I think 99.99% of you are wrong. In fact, dead wrong. I think these remarks that 'he has no regard for human life', etc are WAYYY off the mark.
W has no regard for human life, unless it happens to be a fetus - then he is "on the job". Once you are born, it's OK by him if you are subjected to cluster bombs, land mines, depleted uranium munitions, etc, especially if you are not a Christian.

Cyrus said:
I honestly think this is a case of ignorance. He thought he could do a lot of honest to goodness GOOD in the middle east by spreading democracy, even if that meant covering his ears to what he didn't want to hear by nay-sayers in the government. It was his lack of of willingness to listen and think things through *before* setting out on them (with good intentions) that got him into the mess. And not putting his VP in check, letting Chenney have TOO much clout in DC and doing far too much behind the scenes with Haliburton in Iraq - a total disgrace.
Bush is NOT spreading democracy in the ME. He is spreading death and destruction in the ME. The US is not in the business of promoting democracy around the world, as you would know if you followed the election of Hamas in Palestine. Democratically elected governments are attacked and toppled if they don't hew to the business interests running the US government. You are too young to remember the Contras, but I urge you to research how another US president claimed to be spreading "democracy" by stealing arms from the US military, funneling them through Israel and private arms dealers, selling them to Iran, and using the "returns" (they certainly were not profits) to finance an illegal war.

Cyrus said:
I would argue its CHENNEY NOT BUSH that is the real evil guy in the WH.
So this is how Bush is not evil? He is a good guy compared to Cheney? I'm a pretty nice guy compared to Jeffrey Dahmer, don't you think? Haven't killed any innocent kids for weeks, and rarely even snack on their remains. Come on. This kind of revisionism is sick. Evil is evil, no matter under what pretenses it is practiced, and no matter how many US flags are ranked in back of the perpetrators when they claim to be in the right.
 
  • #41
Since I opened this bag or worms, I thought I'd make myself clear that I do not personally think that W is "evil." I think that he is made of lower stuff. Not lower than me, but lower than the stuff of a president. HE did not get himself into Yale. He did not get himself into the Texas Nat'l guard. He did not get himself a dismal oil company, nor a baseball team, and he certainly did not put himself where he is now.

The stupid things he has said have embarrassed the hell out our nation. I don't just mean his voluminous "mistakes" in speaking either, I mean things like referring to the actions in the ME as a "Crusade." Like saying "Bring it on." Like "Good bye from the world's greatest polluter." These things that he has said, on behalf of representing our country, already fill several books.

THis is not about politics, it's about the person. A person who thinks it's proper to give the German head of state an impromptu and unwelcome shoulder massage. This person was an embarrassment.

In his good-bye speech, when he talked of "good and evil" in the world, I did not get angry because I thought he was the evil one, I got incensed by his belief that he considered himself able to determine between the two.

His constant "brain-freezes" during speeches and press conferences are good comedy, but they indicate an inability to think on the fly. If it is actually true that he was making the big decisions on a daily basis, then I do not believe that he was capable of ever holding "all the facts" in his head long enough to perform the proper analysis.

I'm sure that W always thought he had the best interests of the country in mind. It's the quality of that mind I am sick of.
 
Last edited:
  • #42
turbo-1 said:
W has no regard for human life, unless it happens to be a fetus - then he is "on the job". Once you are born, it's OK by him if you are subjected to cluster bombs, land mines, depleted uranium munitions, etc, especially if you are not a Christian.

Sorry turbo, but this doesn't fly. You are simply stating your opinion on what you think he thinks - it's pure speculation.

Bush is NOT spreading democracy in the ME. He is spreading death and destruction in the ME. The US is not in the business of promoting democracy around the world, as you would know if you followed the election of Hamas in Palestine. Democratically elected governments are attacked and toppled if they don't hew to the business interests running the US government. You are too young to remember the Contras, but I urge you to research how another US president claimed to be spreading "democracy" by stealing arms from the US military, funneling them through Israel and private arms dealers, selling them to Iran, and using the "returns" (they certainly were not profits) to finance an illegal war.

Again, this doesn't not have to do with what I said. I said he *Thinks* he is doing good.

So this is how Bush is not evil? He is a good guy compared to Cheney? I'm a pretty nice guy compared to Jeffrey Dahmer, don't you think? Haven't killed any innocent kids for weeks, and rarely even snack on their remains. Come on. This kind of revisionism is sick. Evil is evil, no matter under what pretenses it is practiced, and no matter how many US flags are ranked in back of the perpetrators when they claim to be in the right.

Bad things out of ignorance isn't "evil" -it's ignorance. Bad things with intention are evil. I argue Chenney had the intention to push for war more than Bush because Chenney had (and did) make a lot of money for halliburton.
 
  • #43
Chi Meson said:
I do not personally think that W is "evil." I think that he is made of lower stuff.

I think that's pretty much the case. It's in his nature. And he has proven himself unqualified for the job. His career only seems to demonstrate that he is perfectly willing to use his daddy and deceit as shortcuts.

He wanted to be President, and his focus has sadly been on grasping and keeping power by whatever means, rather than doing the job of a President. Of being a leader of all the people at least some of the time, instead of a partner to special interests and ignorant ideology all of the time.
 
  • #44
I wasn't sure if I should start my own thread or just throw this tidbit in here as it is directly related to both G.W. and today.

3 days after the start of gulf war II, March 23rd, 2003, I stood back and noticed that the nation was a bit divided over what we had just started. I decided to write a pair of simple stories that were the best case and worst case scenarios possible. Little did I know that almost everything in both stories would come true.

I'd never meant to publish such a silly little pair of stories, but today it seems somewhat appropriate.

"[URL dual time line story.
A case study in future history.[/URL]

If anyone wants to take the stories seriously and criticize my naivety, don't bother, it's already been done.

http://home.europa.com/~garry/fh_response.html"

And yes, I didn't get the inauguration day right. Perhaps I was predicting this goodbye W thread. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #45
Cyrus said:
It's funny that I think 99.99% of you are wrong. In fact, dead wrong. I think these remarks that 'he has no regard for human life', etc are WAYYY off the mark.
Cyrus, did you not notice that you countered hyperbole with hyperbole? This statement above is saying that only one of 10,000 people in this thread has an opinion that is better than, say, "somewhat mistaken."
I honestly think this is a case of ignorance. He thought he could do a lot of honest to goodness GOOD in the middle east by spreading democracy, even if that meant covering his ears to what he didn't want to hear by nay-sayers in the government. It was his lack of of willingness to listen and think things through *before* setting out on them (with good intentions) that got him into the mess. And not putting his VP in check, letting Chenney have TOO much clout in DC and doing far too much behind the scenes with Haliburton in Iraq - a total disgrace.

I would argue its CHENNEY NOT BUSH that is the real evil guy in the WH.
Otherwise, I agree with you. Cheney, along with Addington, his Chief of staff, engineered the method by which they could not only get their minion into the WH, but managed to get themselves in the WH. On top of that, they found a loophole that allows the VP to be NOT answerable to the president. The proof was in the paycheck, Cheney was paid his salary by the Senate. The so-called liberal media just shrugged and let this one go.
 
  • #46
Good riddance is all I can say.
 
  • #47
Don't slam the door on your way out...
Certainly one of the worst presidents in recent times. Attacking Iraq was a huge mistake and a proven lie - no WMD ever was found. As for "spreading democracy", who does he think he is that he has the right to invade a country, kill 50.000 civilians to "spread democracy" ? How would he like it if his country was invaded to spread communism?

He's made enemies all over the world and i don't think there's a single country, or even non-American person that thinks higher of the USA now than he/she did during Clinton.

And if there's anything that spawns terrorism, then it's having people hate you. "The Bush doctrine" has done just that. As for Iraq, that country is simply too primitive to live quietly under democracy. So, all the bad stuff, and there will be plenty for the years to come, will be seen as America's fault, or Bush' fault. USA has a big valley to climb out of, though electing Obama is a good start.
 
  • #48
Cyrus said:
Sorry turbo, but this doesn't fly. You are simply stating your opinion on what you think he thinks - it's pure speculation.
The speculation is that this body has a thinking brain. As Albert would have said, W merely needs a spinal cord.
 
  • #49
The man himself admits that his biggest achievement in 8 years was getting reelected. Some patriot!
 
  • #50
Red Rum said:
The man himself admits that his biggest achievement in 8 years was getting reelected. Some patriot!

His greatest achievement was nothing. And I mean literally nothing, his greatest achievement was convincing idiots to vote for an idiot, I can do that, I can't explain how or why but given the money the family and business connections I can wreck any country in the world.
 
  • #51
Less than 24 hours left!

ANI_WOOODY.GIF

01snooopy.gif
 

Attachments

  • ANI_WOOODY.GIF
    ANI_WOOODY.GIF
    4.7 KB · Views: 342
  • 01snooopy.gif
    01snooopy.gif
    5.4 KB · Views: 381
Last edited:
  • #52
He's still getting a little work done. Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean just got their sentences commuted:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j6mH44rWD9yyZf_AZ7YxQDVFL7WwD95QC1FO0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #53
Math Is Hard said:
He's still getting a little work done. Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean just got their sentences commuted:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j6mH44rWD9yyZf_AZ7YxQDVFL7WwD95QC1FO0

Lou Dobbs will be dancing a jig this afternoon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #54
turbo-1 said:
W has no regard for human life, unless it happens to be a fetus - then he is "on the job".

And what did he do for fetuses?? OK, the late term abortion bill, but even Biden voted for that... Actually, he probably increased abortion even taking the late term abortion bill in account since he cut family planning support to the Third World. It has been shown that when women are denied birth control they use abortion as the birth control of last resort.

So he really wasn't even interested in the life of the fetus.
 
  • #55
http://users.telenet.be/yitian/goodbye-600.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #56
What I want to know is where is the media coverage of Bush's welcome home party in Midland Texas?

Oh wait. Here it is:
Meanwhile, in Midland: Bush's homecoming
Hundreds of people have begun streaming into Centennial Plaza in downtown Midland for a welcome-home rally for ex-President Bush. Eight years ago, Bush held a final good-by rally in the place before heading to Washington for his inauguration. On Tuesday, after attending Barack Obama's swearing-in in Washington, the former president and first lady headed back to Texas for a 5:20 p.m. event. Thousands are expected. Bush loyalists -- some festooned with Bush-friendly buttons -- were given large red and blue W signs and Texas flags. On each side of a large outdoor stage are huge screens with the Texas flag and and words "Welcome Home President and Mrs. Bush."

Midland bling-bling for George W. Bush's Homecoming

Supporters dismissed the problems, praised the man. "We're very proud of him," said Kenneth Reynolds of Midland. "In my opinion he's done an outstanding job. He's done a good job for our economy out here in West Texas. I don't think had anything to do with the economy problem -- it was other people. "
http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/01/meanwhile-in-midland-bushs-hom.html

I see it wasn't his fault.
 
  • #57
Math Is Hard said:
He's still getting a little work done. Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean just got their sentences commuted:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j6mH44rWD9yyZf_AZ7YxQDVFL7WwD95QC1FO0

Only two.

Randall "Duke" Cunningham, Edwin Edwards, George Ryan, Michael Milken, Bob Ney, Ted Stevens, Jack Abramoff, all left off the list (as was John Walker Lindh, but, seriously).

No pre-emptive pardons for anyone in the Bush administration.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #58
LowlyPion said:
I see it wasn't his fault.

Can't be his fault, because he really didn't do anything.
 
  • #60
OMG.

I have just found out that W was a virtual management twin of one of my old bosses.

Whilst perusing the web I ran across some controversy about how Obama had changed the dress code in the white house:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29whitehouse.html?_r=1"
New York Times
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
Published: January 28, 2009

Thus did an ironclad rule of the George W. Bush administration — coat and tie in the Oval Office at all times — fall by the wayside ...

My experience:

OmCheeto's old boss said:
Your socks are too short. Yes. It's a clause in the dress code. I'm afraid I'm going to have to put it in your personnel file. Consider this your first warning. 3 more warnings and you will be terminated. Do you understand?
(Abbreviated sport socks are not allowed. Abbreviated sport socks are those that are defined as those socks that do not extend at least 2" above the ankle.)

For years following, this was known as the "Sock Wars". I was also rudely referred henceforth to as "Mr. Sissy Socks" by my fellow coworkers.

I should have filed a lawsuit for harassment...

From the above mentioned New York Times story:
Under Mr. Bush, punctuality was a virtue. Meetings started early — the former president once locked Secretary of State Colin L. Powell out of the Cabinet Room when Mr. Powell showed up a few minutes late — and ended on time.

Guess what...

OmCheeto's old boss said:
I've written you another reprimand. This time for not showing up on time for work. I had the administrative assistant go over your timesheets for the last year, and you have been late 120 times out of the 210 working days. This is highly inappropriate. You have 2 more warnings left, and then you will be terminated.

hmmmm... what did the analysis, which consumed 4 hours of the AA's time, look like you might ask?

Late! 1 minute on 60 separate occasions.
Late! 2 minutes on 30 separate occasions.

....

Sorry to bring this up and remind you all of him, but when I saw how, as our president, he dwelled on pedantic petty trivialities, it brought up old bad memories, and I just had to vent.

:redface:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K