MHB Can Linear Integral Operators Be Combined to Prove a Trivial Inequality?

sarrah1
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I have a linear integral operator (related to integral equations)

$(Ky)(x)=\int_{a}^{b} \,k(x,s) y(s) ds$ and another one $(Ly)(x)=\int_{a}^{b} \,l(x,s) y(s) ds$ both are continuous

Before I proceed can I write:

$Ky=\int_{a}^{b} \,k(.,s) y(s) ds$ ? (I saw this notation in some books)

I also have $|b|.||L||<1 $ (b is a scalar)

Thus I need to prove that:

$||({(I-bL)}^{-1}.(K-L)||\le\frac{||K-L||}{1-|b|.||L||}$ #

I know it's correct since

$||{(I-bL)}^{-1}||\le \frac{1}{(1-|b|.||L||)} $ (from the geometric series theorem of bounded linear operators)

Thus

$||({(I-bL)}^{-1}.(K-L)||\le||{(I-bL)}^{-1}||.||K-L||$ (from the sub-multiplicative property)
$\le\frac{||K-L||}{1-|b|.||L||}$ #

I think it's correct of course and trivial.
is it?
many thanks
Sarrah
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sarrah said:
I have a linear integral operator (related to integral equations)

$(Ky)(x)=\int_{a}^{b} \,k(x,s) y(s) ds$ and another one $(Ly)(x)=\int_{a}^{b} \,l(x,s) y(s) ds$ both are continuous

Before I proceed can I write:

$Ky=\int_{a}^{b} \,k(.,s) y(s) ds$ ? (I saw this notation in some books)

I also have $|b|.||L||<1 $ (b is a scalar)

Thus I need to prove that:

$||({(I-bL)}^{-1}.(K-L)||\le\frac{||K-L||}{1-|b|.||L||}$ #

I know it's correct since

$||{(I-bL)}^{-1}||\le \frac{1}{(1-|b|.||L||)} $ (from the geometric series theorem of bounded linear operators)

Thus

$||({(I-bL)}^{-1}.(K-L)||\le||{(I-bL)}^{-1}||.||K-L||$ (from the sub-multiplicative property)
$\le\frac{||K-L||}{1-|b|.||L||}$ #

I think it's correct of course and trivial.
is it?
many thanks
Sarrah
The answers to your questions are Yes and Yes. :)
 
thank you very much Oplag
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K