Can liquid ozone substitute for liquid oxygen?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential use of liquid ozone as a substitute for liquid oxygen in various applications, particularly in rocketry. Participants explore the properties, safety concerns, and historical context of using ozone as an oxidizer compared to liquid oxygen and other oxidizers like hydrogen peroxide.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that ozone, being a stronger oxidizing agent than oxygen, could be practical for applications typically using liquid oxygen, despite its higher boiling point.
  • Others highlight the extreme safety concerns associated with liquid ozone, noting its tendency to detonate under minimal provocation.
  • A participant questions the specific conditions under which liquid ozone can be safely stored, comparing it to hydrogen peroxide in terms of detonation thresholds.
  • One participant asserts that liquid ozone has historically been considered for use as a rocket propellant but has been deemed impractical due to self-detonation issues.
  • Another participant shares personal experience with hydrogen peroxide as a safer oxidizer for amateur rocketry, emphasizing the hazards associated with its production and use.
  • There is a claim that ozone is the strongest oxidizer, prompting further inquiry into its practical applications and potential combinations with other substances.
  • Concerns are raised about the reactivity of oxygen and ozone in high-pressure environments, particularly in scuba diving contexts, highlighting the need for caution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and safety of using liquid ozone as an oxidizer, with no consensus reached on its practicality or safety compared to other oxidizers like hydrogen peroxide. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions for safely handling liquid ozone.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the historical context of liquid ozone use in rocketry and the specific safety hazards associated with its handling, including the potential for detonation and the need for careful management of contaminants.

cmb
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
128
I was just wondering that if ozone is a strong[er] oxidizing agent [that oxygen alone] and its boiling point is higher than liquid oxygen [more practical?], then can it be used for applications where liquid oxygen is usually used?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Ignoring the fact that it will easily detonate if you look at it funny, sure ;->
 
OK, but what are the conditions for its detonation? Are there no pressure/temperature conditions that can store it safely?

Is it any worse [lower or higher threshold for detonation] than, say, hydrogen peroxide? (I'm no chemist - go easy with me on the explanation!)
 
Hydrogen peroxide is relatively safe, safe enough for use by a (very) careful amateur rocket builder. Liquid ozone isn't safe, period. The slightest contaminant, the slightest vibration, looking at it cross-eyed, kaboom. Using liquid ozone as a rocket propellant ozidizer is an old idea that goes back to the 1950s or before. It never worked because of the self-detonation problem. Even a liquid O2/O3 mix turned out to be problematic.
 
H2O2 of 85% and stronger has been used by myself and other amateur rocketeers. It is not available from any chemical supplier, so you either need to know a source (sorry, can't share it), or make it yourself from 30% stock. The hot vapors from this can also detonate, so standard distillation is extremely hazardous, and must not be attempted. Once produced, however, it is very stable in the right container materials and poses no detonation hazard. It is an extremely strong oxidizer and must be understood and respected fully. You will not find out the needed information from any web search, so I would not consider this strength for your use. It is also a material of interest to DHS.
 
It should be noted that O3 is not a strong oxidizer, it is the strongest oxidizer, the implication being what could you possibly use with it in a practical manner? Possibly liquid NH3?
 
ajkoer@yahoo. said:
It should be noted that O3 is not a strong oxidizer, it is the strongest oxidizer

Is it?
 
RocketSci5KN said:
It is also a material of interest to DHS.

Yes I seem to remember some would-be terrorists being picked up in the UK because of their suspicious acquisition of quantities of hydrogen peroxide.
 
RocketSci5KN said:
Ignoring the fact that it will easily detonate if you look at it funny, sure ;->

I'd say so! Even pressurized O2 gas can kill you. I've used it in scuba diving. Mostly divers breath just plain air but sometimes they mix gases. The training I got about O2 is to treat it with respect. For example it you clean and rebuild a tank valve and there is as much as fingerprint grease left inside a plumbing part it will combust when you fill the tank to 2000+ PSI. People have had fingers blown off or worst when a valve is opened on a high pressure O2 scuba tank when there was oil residue inside the value. O3 would be even more reactive.

BTW the only use of pure O2 under water is on some VERY specialized dives that most people would never attempt. The injuries happen in the shops where people work on the equipment and fill tanks.
 
  • #10
Grated you had a power source, could you convert the O2 as it entered your combustion chamber. I guess it would also require your oxidizer and propellant to be mixed in the same place you combust it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K