Can Lorentzian Relativity Unify Quantum Mechanics and Einsteinian Relativity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mangaroosh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential unification of Quantum Mechanics (QM) and Lorentzian relativity, particularly in relation to the concept of time. Participants highlight that both QM and Einsteinian relativity utilize different interpretations of time, with QM adopting a more Newtonian perspective. The conversation reveals that while Lorentzian relativity incorporates absolute time, it does not offer a viable path to unify with QM, as relativistic QM already aligns with Einstein's special relativity. The Wheeler-DeWitt equation is mentioned as a critical point of interest, indicating the timeless nature of the universe in quantum gravity theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics (QM)
  • Familiarity with Einstein's Special Relativity
  • Knowledge of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation
  • Concepts of spacetime in General Relativity (GR)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation on the nature of time in quantum gravity
  • Explore the differences between Lorentzian and Einsteinian relativity
  • Investigate the concept of absolute time in Lorentzian relativity
  • Learn about quantum field theory and its relationship with special relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum mechanics and relativity, particularly in understanding the nature of time.

  • #31
Evo said:
This thread has been sufficiently answered.
Not quite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqeSUAlI5uI
Guess Who - No Time

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARgiPJobKnE
Chambers Brothers - Time has come today

Turn up the volume :-p according to preference - or not.


Now the problem is sufficiently answered. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
702
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
205
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 179 ·
6
Replies
179
Views
15K
Replies
27
Views
3K