MHB Can $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ Be Proven as a Principal Ideal Domain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter javi410
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Primes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a prime \( p \neq 3 \) can be expressed as \( p = x^2 + 3y^2 \) if \( p \equiv 1 \pmod{3} \). The initial argument hinges on the fact that since \(-3\) is a quadratic residue modulo \( p \), the ideal \((p)\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]\) must factor into two ideals. However, the main challenge is proving that \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]\) is a principal ideal domain (PID). It is concluded that \(\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]\) is not a PID because it fails to be a unique factorization domain, as demonstrated by the factorization of \(4\) into non-prime elements. Thus, the original claim cannot be established.
javi410
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Im trying to prove that a prime $p\neq 3$ is of the form $p=x^2 + 3y^2$ if $p \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$.

I have think in a prove as follows:
As we know that $-3$ is a quadratic residue mod p, we know that the ideal $(p)$ must divide $(x^2 + 3) = (x + \sqrt{-3})(x - \sqrt{-3})$ in the ring $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$.
$p$ don't divide any of the factors so it can not be prime in $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$, so there are ideals $I,J$ of $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ such that
\[
(p) = I\cdot J
\]
and, if we prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID, we have the result as we can take elements $u,v$ of $I$ and $J$ such that $u\cdot v$ has norm $p^2$, therefore the norm of $u = a^2 + b\sqrt{-3}$ is $p =a^2 + 3b^2$.

The problem is that I don't know how to prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
javi410 said:
Hi,
Im trying to prove that a prime $p\neq 3$ is of the form $p=x^2 + 3y^2$ if $p \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$.

I have think in a prove as follows:
As we know that $-3$ is a quadratic residue mod p, we know that the ideal $(p)$ must divide $(x^2 + 3) = (x + \sqrt{-3})(x - \sqrt{-3})$ in the ring $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$.
$p$ don't divide any of the factors so it can not be prime in $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$, so there are ideals $I,J$ of $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ such that
\[
(p) = I\cdot J
\]
and, if we prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID, we have the result as we can take elements $u,v$ of $I$ and $J$ such that $u\cdot v$ has norm $p^2$, therefore the norm of $u = a^2 + b\sqrt{-3}$ is $p =a^2 + 3b^2$.

The problem is that I don't know how to prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID.

Thanks!

Wellcome on MHB javi410!...

Setting $p= 3 n + a$, where it must be $a=1$ or $a=2$, You have...

$\displaystyle x^{2} + 3\ y^{2} = 3\ n + a \implies x^{2} \equiv a\ \text{mod}\ 3\ (1)$

Now the equation (1) has solution only if $a = 1$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
javi410 said:
The problem is that I don't know how to prove that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-3}]$ is a PID.

You won't be, because $\Bbb Z[\sqrt{-3}]$ is not a principal ideal domain.

Consider $4 = (1 + \sqrt{-3})(1 - \sqrt{-3})$. $2$ divides $4$, but doesn't divide either of $1 \pm \sqrt{-3}$, so it's not a prime. Thus, it's not an unique factorization domain, so cannot possibly be a PID either.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top