Can Mathtype Create All Types of Math Symbols and Signs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Font Program
AI Thread Summary
MathType is a recommended tool for creating various math symbols and signs, particularly when used as a plugin for Microsoft Word. Users can access MathType through its official website. LaTeX is also suggested as an alternative for those familiar with it. The discussion emphasizes MathType's user-friendliness and effectiveness for math-specific needs. Overall, MathType is highlighted as a versatile solution for generating mathematical content.
Spectre32
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
IS there a specific program I can use to creat all of the different sorts of math signs and such?


Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I can't think of a program to make a math-specific FONT but you can either a: use LaTeX like on this site or, more realistically, use the Mathtype plugin for Microsoft Word.
 
where do i get the mathtype plugin for word?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top