Can Modified Newtonian Dynamics Explain Dark Matter?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Elbraido
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics Newtonian
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the viability of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) as an alternative to dark matter in explaining cosmic phenomena. Participants explore the contrasting views on MOND and dark matter, referencing experimental evidence and theoretical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why two teams studying MOND did not compare their experiments, suggesting a potential difference in methodologies.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about MOND's acceptance, noting that it fails to address many phenomena, while also acknowledging that dark matter is not definitively proven.
  • There is a query regarding the timeline for discovering dark matter particles, referencing a statement by Sean Carroll about the implications of not finding them within a few years.
  • A later reply indicates a lack of knowledge on the matter, reflecting uncertainty about the timeline for dark matter discovery.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the efficacy of MOND versus dark matter, with some favoring dark matter while others remain open to the discussion of MOND. The timeline for potential discoveries remains unresolved and speculative.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the experimental evidence for both MOND and dark matter, highlighting the complexity of the topic and the limitations of current understanding.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in cosmology, alternative theories to dark matter, and the ongoing debates in astrophysics may find this discussion relevant.

Elbraido
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
Hello Everbody
In Sci Shows newest video they take about alternates to Dark Matter and one of these is Modified Newtonian dynamicse. The guy states that there were two teams one proved that it existed and the other did the the opposite.
My question is why they can't and didn't compare there experiments?. There must be a difference in their experiments.
Thanks for any answers
Here is the Link
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I haven't watched the video but here's my take on the issue: MOND is generally not in favor, as there are too many things it doesn't handle, but it has not been totally discredited. Dark Matter is more in favor but it too is not a sure thing. Dark matter particles have never been observed, but not for lack of trying.
 
phinds said:
I haven't watched the video but here's my take on the issue: MOND is generally not in favor, as there are too many things it doesn't handle, but it has not been totally discredited. Dark Matter is more in favor but it too is not a sure thing. Dark matter particles have never been observed, but not for lack of trying.
how many years do you believe until we might find them? I heard Sean Carrol talking to Joe Rogan saying if we don't find it within the next 2-3 years we might have to question our theories? Is that actually the case?
 
AlenKovac said:
how many years do you believe until we might find them? I heard Sean Carrol talking to Joe Rogan saying if we don't find it within the next 2-3 years we might have to question our theories? Is that actually the case?
That's all beyond my knowledge
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
12K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
24K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
8K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K