Can n-spheres have temporal components in their metric tensor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter space-time
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the metric tensor for a 4-sphere using 5D spherical coordinates, specifically focusing on the implications of adding a temporal component to n-spheres. The derived metric tensor for the 4-sphere is presented as ds² = g_{ab} dx^{a} dx^{b} = dt² - dr² - r² dθ² - r² sin²(θ) dφ², with a signature of (- + + +). Participants debate the validity of applying a temporal component to n-spheres and the differences between Minkowski and spherical coordinate metrics, concluding that while a temporal component can be added, it results in a different geometry than that of a purely spatial n-sphere.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric tensors in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and their applications
  • Knowledge of Minkowski space and its metric
  • Basic concepts of n-dimensional geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of metric tensors in higher-dimensional spaces
  • Explore the implications of adding temporal components to spatial metrics
  • Study the differences between Minkowski and spherical coordinate metrics
  • Learn about coordinate transformations in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the geometry of n-spheres and the application of temporal components in metric tensors.

space-time
Messages
218
Reaction score
4
I just recently derived the metric tensor of the 4-sphere by embedding the coordinate system within 5D spherical coordinates, deriving the tangential vectors and then doing the dot product with all of the tangential vectors except for the er vector since r stays constant. I then added a sign signature to this 4-sphere metric tensor which I chose to be (- + + +).

Then a crucial memory hit me. A long time ago, back when I first learned how to derive metric tensors, I remember looking up the metric tensor for 3D spherical coordinates online. When I did this, a page with the metric tensor for spherical coordinates in Minkowski space came up. This particular metric tensor looked like this:

g00 = -1
g11 = 1
g22= r2
and g33= r2sin2(θ)

Every other term was 0.

Now I know that this particular space-time is flat while the 4-sphere that I recently derived is curved, but the Minkowski spherical metric tensor above is not even the same as the metric tensor for 4D spherical coordinates (the coordinate system you use when deriving the 3-sphere).

Since this Minkowski version of spherical coordinates was different from the metric tensor for 4D spherical polar coordinates, this made me wonder whether or not you can actually apply a temporal component to n-spheres.

Can someone please tell me if it is valid to apply a sign signature to an n-sphere (indicating that n-spheres can have temporal components) or if the metric tensors of n-spheres can only be purely spatial?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
are you sure that's the metric of the 4-sphere? this looks like Minkowski metric in spherical coords.

ds^{2} = g_{ab} dx^{a} dx^{b}= dt^{2} - dr^2 - r^2 d \theta^2 - r^2 sin^2 \theta d \phi^2

Also what do you mean by applying a component to n-sphere? or temporal component?
Also what do you mean by "Minkowski version of spherical coordinates ... for 4D spherical polar coordinates"?
 
Last edited:
space-time said:
Can someone please tell me if it is valid to apply a sign signature to an n-sphere (indicating that n-spheres can have temporal components) or if the metric tensors of n-spheres can only be purely spatial?

You can, but the resulting metric will describe a different geometry than the surface of an n-sphere in space (unless, of course, you can find a coordinate transformation under which the metric components transform into that new form - and you cannot).
 
Nugatory said:
You can, but the resulting metric will describe a different geometry than the surface of an n-sphere in space (unless, of course, you can find a coordinate transformation under which the metric components transform into that new form - and you cannot).

Ok. Now I have another question. If I derive the metric tensor for the 3-sphere instead and then put an extra row and column within the matrix for a -1 (as is done with the Minkowski version of 3D spherical coordinates), then will that particular metric describe the 3D surface of a 4D sphere with the 4th dimension being time (or in other words, spherically curved space time)? Here is what I am talking about:

g00= -1
g11=r2sin2(ø)sin2(ψ)
g22=r2sin2(ψ)
g33=r2

As for my coordinate labels:
x0=t (my temporal component)
x1
x2
x3

All other elements are 0. You may notice that I simply added a negative 1 element to the matrix that would have otherwise simply been the 3-sphere (just as the Minkowski version of spherical coordinates just adds a -1 to what would otherwise just be 3D spherical polar coordinates).

This is what I meant when I asked: Would the metric tensor above describe spherically curved space time?
 
ChrisVer said:
are you sure that's the metric of the 4-sphere? this looks like Minkowski metric in spherical coords.

ds^{2} = g_{ab} dx^{a} dx^{b}= dt^{2} - dr^2 - r^2 d \theta^2 - r^2 sin^2 \theta d \phi^2

Also what do you mean by applying a component to n-sphere? or temporal component?
Also what do you mean by "Minkowski version of spherical coordinates ... for 4D spherical polar coordinates"?

It is the Minkowski metric of spherical coordinates. I did not actually post my 4-sphere metric.
 
Yes. Such a metric would describe a spacetime where the space would form a 3Sphere.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
870
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
924
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K