Can Nanomaterials Be Used to Destroy Cancer Cells?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EnumaElish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cancer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential use of nanomaterials, specifically nanodiscs and other nanotechnologies, in the treatment of cancer cells. Participants explore various methods, challenges, and implications of using these materials in medical applications, with a focus on both theoretical and experimental aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention a study indicating that tiny magnetic nanodiscs can disrupt cancer cell membranes, leading to cell self-destruction when subjected to a low magnetic field.
  • Concerns are raised about potential side effects of having nanodiscs in the bloodstream.
  • Another participant introduces alternative methods for destroying cancer cells, including high power lasers and liquid helium, noting the challenge of non-invasive delivery.
  • There is a discussion about the difficulty of identifying cancer cells in the body and whether the nanodiscs can discriminate between cancerous and healthy cells.
  • One participant suggests that the nanodiscs need to be coated with tumor-specific antibodies to target cancer cells effectively.
  • A younger participant shares a personal story about a family member with lung cancer and inquires about the effectiveness of nanotechnology compared to traditional treatments like lung removal.
  • Another participant responds to the inquiry by stating that nanotechnology is still experimental and not yet applicable in clinical settings, emphasizing the importance of proven treatments.
  • A question is posed about the programming of nanomaterials to specifically attack cancer cells.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness and safety of nanomaterials in cancer treatment. There is no consensus on the feasibility of these technologies, and multiple competing ideas about their application and challenges remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in current research on nanotechnology for cancer treatment, including the need for specificity in targeting cancer cells and the experimental status of these approaches.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in cancer treatment innovations, nanotechnology applications in medicine, and the challenges of developing targeted therapies may find this discussion relevant.

EnumaElish
Science Advisor
Messages
2,348
Reaction score
124
"Tiny magnetic discs just a millionth of a metre in diameter could be used to kill cancer cells, according to a new study.

"Laboratory tests found the so-called 'nanodiscs', around 60 billionths of a metre thick, could be used to disrupt the membranes of cancer cells, causing them to self-destruct.

"The results of the research appear in the journal Nature Materials.

"One of the study's authors, Dr Elena Rozhlova of Argonne National Laboratory in the United States, says subjecting the nanodiscs to a low magnetic field for around ten minutes was enough to destroy 90% of cancer cells in tests."

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2009/11/30/2757570.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org


That's interesting.

Hopefully there won't be any side effects from having nano-disks floating in your blood stream.
 
In other news, high power lasers, droplets of sulphuric acid, and liquid helium can be effectively used to destroy cancer cells. All that remains is a non-invasive method to deliver liquid helium to cancer cells without damaging healthy cells. Scientists are be working on it and they expect a breakthrough in the next 50 to 100 years.
 
The biggest challenge, I think, is finding and identifying all the cancer cells in a human body. Do the discs discriminate or do they have to be 'steered' by the magnetic field?
 
They have to be coated with tumor-specific antibodies.
 
Hey, um I'm 13 and I just found out my uncel has lung cancer and may not make it. I have heard about nanotechnology being used to kill cancer by protecting a poison with fullerine or 'Buckyballs' and the nanos are lead to the cancer cells and the fullerine barrier breaks sending the nanos into the cancer killing it. I was wondering if you knew if it works for lung cancer and if it would be any better than actaully getting the lung removed. They may remove the lung but if it's in two there isn't much that they can do. Please help. We don't have much time.
 
Hi ScottMyHero, I'm sorry to hear about your uncle. Nanotechnology is not yet researched enough to be applied in the clinic, it is still an experimental technology. There are however many treatments available that are proven, the doctors in the hospital will be the best to judge what treatment should be applied to treat the particular lung tumor.
 
How do you even program a nanomaterial to attack a cancer cell? :O
 

Similar threads

Medical Can Stem Cells Taken from the Body Cure Colorectal Cancer?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Medical Cancer Research Fraud: Mayo Clinic Finds Massive Fraud
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Medical Fructose Increases Cancer Cell Proliferation
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Medical How can electromagnetic fields affect our cells and potentially lead to cancer?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Medical Gene Therapy Successfully Treats Teenage Boy with Sickle Cell Anemia
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Medical 3-bromopyruvate a miracle compound for certain cancer stuck in limbo
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Medical Using CRISPR to cut HIV out of infected cells
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
Cancer drugs and Alzheimer's, Oh my
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Medical Pathogenesis of Dengue? Can someone outline it?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
TFAM Protein: Investigational Treatment for Neurodegenerative Diseases?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K