Can Newton's G and the "Einstein Scalar" Be Related?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kent davidge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the "Einstein Scalar" derived from the Einstein Tensor and the gravitational constant G in Newton's law. Participants explore the mathematical definitions and implications of these concepts, questioning whether they are related or merely share a symbol. The conversation includes technical reasoning and references to tensor calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire whether the "Einstein Scalar" can be derived from the Einstein Tensor similarly to how the Ricci Scalar is derived from the Ricci Tensor.
  • It is noted that the Einstein Tensor's trace can be expressed as ##G^a{}_a = -R^a{}_a##, and that this relationship is often overlooked in discussions.
  • Participants clarify that the Ricci Scalar and the Einstein Scalar are related through their definitions, with one being the negative of the other.
  • There is a suggestion that the G in Newton's law is not related to the Einstein Scalar, being described instead as a unit conversion factor.
  • One participant emphasizes the physical significance of the Ricci Scalar in terms of energy density and pressure in a local orthonormal frame.
  • A later reply mentions the omission of constant conversion factors in the equations presented, indicating a potential area for clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between the Einstein Scalar and Newton's G, with some asserting they are unrelated while others explore the mathematical connections. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential oversight of constant conversion factors in the equations discussed, which may affect the interpretation of the relationships between the scalars and tensors.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
Is it possible to take the "Eistein Scalar" from the Einstein Tensor, like one can take the Ricci Scalar from the Ricci Tensor? If so, is the G of Newton's law the same as this "Einstein Scalar" or is it just the same symbol used in very different things.

(Sorry for my bad English. I think Meaning of G would be a better title for the thread.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kent davidge said:
Is it possible to take the "Eistein Scalar" from the Einstein Tensor, like one can take the Ricci Scalar from the Ricci Tensor? If so, is the G of Newton's law the same as this "Einstein Scalar" or is it just the same symbol used in very different things.

(Sorry for my bad English. I think Meaning of G would be a better title for the thread.)

The term isn't used much, but given the Ricci scalar ##R = R^a{}_a## , we can write the equivalent for the Einstein tensor, ##G^a{}_a = -R^a{}_a##. See for instance http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/outline2.html.

In particular, note that ##R = R^a{}_a = -T^a{}_a##, while ##G^a{}_a = T^a{}_a##, thus ##G^a{}_a = -R^a{}_a##

Because one is just the negative of the other, people usually talk about the Ricci scalar ##R^a{}_a## and there's no real need to talk about ##G^a{}_a##.

Neither one is related to the G in Newton's law, which can be regarded as a unit conversion factor. Physically, the significance of R would be that if we choose a local orthonormal frame, ##R = \rho - P_{xx} - P_{yy} - P_{zz}## or in the case where the pressure is isotropic, ##R = \rho - 3P##. Here ##\rho## is the density (energy per unit volume), and P is the pressure (or the x, y, and z components of the pressure if they're not all the same).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge
pervect said:
The term isn't used much, but given the Ricci scalar ##R = R^a{}_a## , we can write the equivalent for the Einstein tensor, ##G^a{}_a = -R^a{}_a##. See for instance http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/outline2.html.

In particular, note that ##R = R^a{}_a = -T^a{}_a##, while ##G^a{}_a = T^a{}_a##, thus ##G^a{}_a = -R^a{}_a##

Because one is just the negative of the other, people usually talk about the Ricci scalar ##R^a{}_a## and there's no real need to talk about ##G^a{}_a##.

Neither one is related to the G in Newton's law, which can be regarded as a unit conversion factor. Physically, the significance of R would be that if we choose a local orthonormal frame, ##R = \rho - P_{xx} - P_{yy} - P_{zz}## or in the case where the pressure is isotropic, ##R = \rho - 3P##. Here ##\rho## is the density (energy per unit volume), and P is the pressure (or the x, y, and z components of the pressure if they're not all the same).
Many thanks.
 
You're welcome - I should probably add that I followed Baez's lead in glossing over some constant conversions factors when I wrote ##G_{aa} = T_{aa}## rather than ##G_{aa} = 8 \pi T_{aa}## or even ##G_{aa} = (8 \pi G / c^4) T_{aa}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kent davidge

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
6K