Can Non-Atomic Life Forms Exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter michaelklachko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Forms Life
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the possibility of non-atomic life forms, specifically considering structures composed of electrons or photons rather than traditional atomic matter. Participants examine the definition of life and the necessary properties that such entities would need to possess, including self-replication and stability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether stable structures made entirely of electrons or photons could exist as life forms, separate from atomic matter.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the definition of life is not well-defined and suggests that properties like self-reproduction are essential for considering something as life.
  • A participant proposes the idea of non-atomic structures functioning similarly to viruses, questioning their potential complexity and stability.
  • It is noted that carbon's ability to form complex bonds is fundamental to known life forms, and any non-carbon-based life remains speculative without evidence.
  • Discussion includes the notion that life requires a system capable of storing and processing information, with DNA or RNA serving this role on Earth, but questions whether non-atomic mechanisms could fulfill this requirement.
  • Another participant highlights that definitions of life vary, referencing Stephen Hawking's view on computer viruses as a form of life, contrasting it with traditional biological definitions that emphasize metabolism.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the definition of life is crucial to the discussion, but multiple competing views on what constitutes life remain unresolved. The possibility of non-atomic life forms is debated, with no consensus on their feasibility or definition.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of their definitions of life and the speculative nature of non-atomic life forms, emphasizing the need for clarity in terminology and criteria for life.

michaelklachko
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'd like to understand if non-atomic life forms are possible. For example, purely electrical ones. I'm not talking about those electron eating bacterias, they are still made out of atoms. Is there a possibility to form a stable structure out of electrons, or photons? Not necessarily in a vacuum, but the structure should not have atomic matter as its building blocks. Does it make any sense?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There are states of matter and energy which bear little resemblance to the world of atoms with which we are familiar.
'Life' however is not a very well defined term, although anything living does require some basic properties such as self reproduction to be considered as life.
Even within the realm of familiar atomic matter there are undecided cases, viruses being the best example.
Basically the question can only be answered if you first can give a precise definition of what you would consider to be life.
 
Well, since you mentioned viruses, let's use that. Do you think it's possible that non-atomic structures could form that would function as a virus (and would be as stable and as complex)?
 
Familiar life is all based on the fact that carbon can form bonds easily with other elements and also with other carbon atoms.
This mean that complex chains and other structures can be formed and these structures are essential for all forms of life we know of.
Anything other than carbon based life has to be pure speculation. there certainly is no evidence for it.
That does not mean it's impossible, but you will find that threads of a purely speculative nature are discouraged here, and often they will be removed.
 
If you read up on some of the abiogenesis work, I think one of the main points is that for life you need some kind of system capable of storing information - likely a lot of information. The system needs to be stable over time, it needs to be able to replicate itself, and it process for translating that information into some kind of effect on the environment it's in.

On earth, this role is filled by DNA or RNA. There's no rule that I'm aware of that excludes other molecules from performing this role. But your question is whether this could be formed by something that is not made up of atoms. I suspect that answer is that there is no rule necessarily excluding non-matter mechanisms, but you run into major issues with the requirement for stability over time when you look for alternative building blocks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trurle
As rootone said, it depends entirely on your definition of life. For example, Stephen Hawking has argued that computer viruses should be considered a form of life. Most biologist, however, consider metabolism, the ability to extract raw nutrients from the surroundings in order to replicate itself, part of what defines life (which is why most don't consider biological viruses to be a form of life). However, if you relax some of the classical definitions of life (many of which are not universally agreed upon), then you might be able to claim that some borderline cases like computer viruses as having the "properties" of life.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trurle

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K