Can Nuclear Secrets Truly Remain Confidential?

  • Thread starter Thread starter seazal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the confidentiality of nuclear weapons technology and the potential for leaks that could enable individuals to construct an atomic bomb. Participants explore the complexities of nuclear proliferation, the challenges of acquiring fissionable material, and the technical aspects of bomb construction.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the ability to keep nuclear weapons technology completely secret, questioning the effectiveness of current safeguards against leaks.
  • One participant suggests that while the basic concept of building a nuclear weapon is not overly complex, the acquisition of sufficient fissionable material presents a significant barrier.
  • Another participant elaborates on the technical requirements for constructing a nuclear bomb, emphasizing the difficulty of enriching uranium and the extensive resources needed for such a process.
  • There is mention of the challenges associated with plutonium bombs, including the necessity of an implosion mechanism, which adds to the complexity of bomb construction.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for detailed information to be available on the dark web, suggesting that while the technical knowledge may be accessible, practical implementation remains highly challenging.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of constructing a nuclear weapon, with some emphasizing the technical barriers and others questioning the effectiveness of secrecy measures. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall security of nuclear technology.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence on specific technical knowledge and the complexity of the processes involved in nuclear weapon construction, highlighting that while information may be available, practical execution is not straightforward.

seazal
Messages
119
Reaction score
3
I know nuclear weapons technology is the most closely guarded secret in the world. But aren't there any leaks at WikiLeaks or elsewhere that can enable a citizen to build an atomic bomb?

What is the safety net that could prevent that?

It's not that I'm looking for nuclear information, but want to know how they can keep certain things so secret that the public will never be exposed to it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think a basic nuclear weapon would be rather easy to make in the age of the microchip and CNC machine. The quantity of fissionable material is the hard part. Secret bomb technology has little to do with it unless you're talking about max yields.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trurle and russ_watters
[MODERATOR: reference to a deleted post edited out.]
The explanation to build a nuclear bomb is really not that difficult if you understand the concept. For a gun type, all you're doing is take a mass of fissile material and set off an explosion which shoots the material into a larger mass of material. This creates a super critical mass which sets off a chain reaction that fissions the majority of the fissile material at once creating a huge explosion. This information can be found on wikipedia. I'd bet there's much more details available on the dark web.

The real problem is getting the material to actually do it. Natural uranium is 99% U-238, .7% U-235. To make a bomb you need at minimum 20% U-235 but ideally you want over 90% U-235. To enrich uranium requires putting it through a massive centrifuge to separate the isotopes and you need thousands of them to gradually step up the enrichment. It takes years of this process to stockpile enough material to make the bomb.

So say you want 5 lbs of 90% U-235 to make a bomb you'd have to process something like 10,000 lbs of uranium. Not exactly something you can do in your backyard.

If you're making it with plutonium it's even more complicated as you must use a breeder reactor to first create the plutonium

This is not something any country can do in complete secrecy. Just like we discovered North Korea building one and we discovered Iran trying to.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
Plutonium bombs are further complicated by requiring an implosion mechanism. Gun type won't work.
 
The OP has been answered. In order to prevent this thread from drifting off-topic, it is now closed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
10K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
18K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
18K