High School Can open sets be described in-terms of closed sets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alpharup
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Sets
Alpharup
Messages
226
Reaction score
17
Let A be an open set and A=(a,b). Can A be described, as closed set as
"or every x>0, all the elements of closed set [a+x,b-x] are elements of A"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The statement in quotes means
##\forall x>0##, ##[a+x, b-x] \subset A##,
which is a true statement.

But
##\forall x>0##, ##[a+x, b-x] \subset [a,b]##
is also a true statement, so you can't use it to define A.
 
  • Like
Likes Alpharup
Yes you are right...It just becomes a subset. But is there any way to describe it?
 
Sure. For example, let "A be the union of all ##[a+x,b-x]## with ##x>0##." Or "A is the smallest set that contain ##[a+x,b-x]## with ##x>0##".
 
  • Like
Likes Alpharup
Yes,,,,the union part...If there were no union, every set (a+x,b-x) is a subset of both (a,b) and [a,b]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K