Can open sets be described in-terms of closed sets?

  • #1
222
17
Let A be an open set and A=(a,b). Can A be described, as closed set as
"or every x>0, all the elements of closed set [a+x,b-x] are elements of A"?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
The statement in quotes means
##\forall x>0##, ##[a+x, b-x] \subset A##,
which is a true statement.

But
##\forall x>0##, ##[a+x, b-x] \subset [a,b]##
is also a true statement, so you can't use it to define A.
 
  • #3
Yes you are right...It just becomes a subset. But is there any way to describe it?
 
  • #4
Sure. For example, let "A be the union of all ##[a+x,b-x]## with ##x>0##." Or "A is the smallest set that contain ##[a+x,b-x]## with ##x>0##".
 
  • #5
Yes,,,,the union part...If there were no union, every set (a+x,b-x) is a subset of both (a,b) and [a,b]
 

Suggested for: Can open sets be described in-terms of closed sets?

Back
Top