Undergrad Can Oscillations Explain Neutrino Anomalies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RobertGC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrino
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the solar and atmospheric neutrino deficits, where fewer neutrinos are detected on Earth than expected. Neutrino oscillation is proposed as a solution, suggesting that neutrinos change types, explaining the discrepancies. Recent experiments, including SNOL, have confirmed the expected number of solar neutrinos, while others like MiniBooNE have raised questions about anomalies related to sterile neutrinos. However, multiple studies have contradicted the LSND and MiniBooNE results, indicating that the anomalies may stem from systemic errors rather than new physics. Overall, the current consensus leans towards established theories rather than the existence of additional neutrino types.
  • #31
No, I just tried to keep it simple
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes weirdoguy, RobertGC, mfb and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
So, you don't do a calculation but guess at an answer. and when your guess doesn't match reality, it's not that your guess is wrong, it's that neutrino oscillations are a bad theory.

I am unconvinced.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, RobertGC and PeroK
  • #33
Not at all, I am just trying to understand the concept, I did not mean to ruffle your feathers
 
  • Like
Likes RobertGC
  • #34
A Majeski said:
I would expect the Solar deficit to be closer to 1/2 or something other than 2/3. This value indicates that the dispersion of three neutrino flavors is basically flat regardless of the detectors proximity to a large neutrino source, like the Sun.
This is wrong. The mechanism at work here is the Mikheev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein effect and adiabatic flavor transitions. The MSW matter effect on oscillations imply that neutrinos exit the Sun almost entirely in the second mass eigenstate (provided that they are energetic enough to be produced above resonance). This in turn means that the nu_e survival probability is based almost exclusively on the nu_e content of that mass eigenstate.

It is also wrong that only two flavors are involved. Theory predicts almost equal numbers of mu and tau neutrinos.

It is not the case that oscillations equilibrate the flavors. The oscillation probabilities depend on several things, including the mixing parameters.

A Majeski said:
also, it seems to me that the neutrino mass change should progress from lightest to heaviest with an accompanied decrease in speed. It should not progress from heaviest to lightest as this would require the speed to increase, I cannot see any example where this occurs in other phenomenon.
This is well known (assuming fixed momentum) and it does not really affect oscillations until wave packets of different mass eigenstates separate which would just average out the oscillations. This does happen for solar neutrinos but as mentioned they effectively only consist of one mass eigenstate anyway so it is not super relevant.

Note: Neutrinos will not change their speed during propagation. They are in a quantum mechanical superposition of their mass states and it is the mass states that move at different velocities.

A Majeski said:
Not at all, I am just trying to understand the concept, I did not mean to ruffle your feathers
You’re not though. You are making assumptions of how things behave and try to draw conclusions based on those (faulty) assumptions. That will never end well and you will not really learn anything. What you should be doing if you wish to understand is to pick up some reference literature on the subject. For example, section III.G of this review.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, Bandersnatch, PAllen and 6 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K