Tris Fray Potter
- 13
- 0
I know the difference between the two, but I was wondering if parabolas ever became so steep that they turned back into an elliptical shape.
The discussion revolves around the relationship between parabolas and ellipses, specifically whether parabolas can become so steep that they transform into elliptical shapes. Participants explore the definitions and properties of conic sections, including their geometric representations and mathematical characteristics.
Participants express disagreement regarding the possibility of parabolas transforming into ellipses. While some assert that such a transformation is impossible, others explore the connections between the two shapes without reaching a consensus.
Participants reference definitions and properties from intermediate algebra and conic sections, indicating that a deeper understanding of these concepts is necessary for clarity. The discussion includes various interpretations of the mathematical relationships between the shapes.
Well observed, indeed. They are different sections of the same double cone, only at different angles:Tris Fray Potter said:I know the difference between the two, but I was wondering if parabolas ever became so steep that they turned back into an elliptical shape.
fresh_42 said:Well observed, indeed. They are different sections of the same double cone, only at different angles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conic_section
Personally, I find the first image in this version better to see what it is about:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kegelschnitt
The necessary research is just studying Algebra at the intermediate level, and you will find the most appropriate instruction, textbook discussions, and exercises. Parabola has its own definition using the distance formula. Ellipse has its own but different definition using the distance formula. The definitions and the distance formula are used in deriving equation of each shape. You will want a good instructional textbook on Intermediate Algebra.Tris Fray Potter said:Thank-you! I've only worked with parabolas on a Cartesian plane, so I didn't know that it was part of a cone, and I couldn't decipher anything I found when I did some research!
Regardless of the connections these ellipses have with parabolas, and how they are all conceivably unified under a similar theme, this question must be answerable as a negative. For we know the expression of a parabola, 0 = Ax2 + Bx1 + Cx0 - y. It is clearly a function in the sense that any input x gets assigned to a single output y. No matter how the parameters A,B, or C are tuned, this quality, of the parabola being a function, is unchanged.Tris Fray Potter said:I was wondering if parabolas ever became so steep that they turned back into an elliptical shape.