Can Pi be Used as a Random Number Generator for Proving Normality?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential use of the digits of the number pi as a random number generator in the context of proving the normality of numbers. Participants explore the properties of irrational numbers, particularly focusing on the concept of normality and its implications for digit distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that grouping the decimal places of an irrational number into sequences of ten could imply a uniform probability of 1/10 for any digit from 0 to 9 appearing.
  • Another participant clarifies that the property of having digits appear with equal probability is characteristic of normal numbers, and expresses uncertainty about the commonality of this property and how it is proven.
  • A different participant challenges the initial claim by stating that the example provided is not an irrational number and argues that the assumption of randomness in digit appearance cannot be proven, citing a specific irrational number with a non-random digit pattern.
  • Another participant mentions that pi is believed to be normal and discusses the rarity of proving a specific number's normality, noting that most known examples of normal numbers are constructed rather than proven from previously interesting numbers.
  • This participant also points out that while almost all real numbers are normal in a measure-theoretic sense, the set of non-normal numbers remains uncountable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of digit distribution in irrational numbers, particularly regarding the randomness and normality of pi. There is no consensus on the implications of these properties or the validity of the initial claims made.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in proving normality and the assumptions involved in defining randomness in digit sequences. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the commonality of normal numbers and the challenges in proving specific instances of normality.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying number theory, particularly concepts related to irrational numbers and normality, as well as individuals exploring the applications of mathematical properties in random number generation.

waht
Messages
1,502
Reaction score
4
Just wondering, if you group decimal places of an irrational number, let's say into sequences of groups of 10, for example,

if k is irrational 4.4252352352,3546262626,224332 (I made that up)

they you group (.4252352352) (3546262626) (and so on)

then my question is that the probability of any number between 0-9 appearing the group is simply 1/10 or .1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This depends on the number, the property you describe is called Normal. If an irrational number is normal then it meets your condition. I do not know how common the property is. Nor am I familiar with how it is proven. I have heard that PI may be normal.
 
First, the number you wrote is not irrational! :)

With regard to the probability of any particular digit appearing in any group of 10, that assumes the digits are "random" which I don't believe you would be able to prove. Moreover, here's an example of an irrational number for which the probability of any of the digits 2..9 appearing is zero:

k = 0.101001000100001 ...

with the obvious pattern of digits. Also, the probabilities of finding zeros and ones are not equal.
 
pi is believed to be normal. You might want to try a google search for using pi as a random number generator.

Proving any given number is normal is pretty rarely done (if ever?). I think most of the examples are "made", like 0.12345678910111213141516... and a similar thing with the primes 0.2357111317..., that is to say people set out to write down a normal number rather than prove a number we were previously interested in (like pi) was normal.

However, almost all (in the measure theory sense) real numbers are normal. This is how normal numbers were shown to exist in the first place. (you can do a similar thing to show irrationals exist without ever exhibiting one by showing the reals are uncountable). The set of non-normal numbers is still uncountable though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K