Can Plastic Be Made Without Oil?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephanus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oil Plastic
AI Thread Summary
Plastic can theoretically be made without oil by extracting carbon from CO2, oxygen from water, hydrogen from seawater, and nitrogen from the atmosphere, but the process is currently economically inefficient and technically challenging. The stability of CO2 makes it difficult to convert into usable polymers, as significant energy is required to break its bonds. While plants naturally produce polymers like cellulose and proteins using similar compounds, these do not meet the conventional definition of plastic. The discussion highlights that, despite advancements like fusion power, oil remains a crucial starting point for the chemical industry, particularly in plastic production. Ultimately, while alternatives exist, practical and economic barriers hinder their widespread adoption.
Stephanus
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
104
Can plastic be made NOT FROM oil?
And not from remains of living organic matter.
I mean, we extract carbon from atmosphere CO2 or from the rock...
Oxygen from atmosphere or sea water...
Hydrogen from sea water...
Nitrogen from atmosphere or other sources...
Combine them together and voila, we get plastic.
Is the process economically inefficient?
Is the process technically difficult?
Is the process scientifically impossible?

Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Plastics are polymers of hydrocarbons. There are many things to consider about why it is very difficult (sometimes currently impossible) and very economically inefficient to make plastics from the starting materials you mentioned.

Carbon, in the form of CO2, is incredibly stable. It takes a significant amount of energy to functionalize the CO double bonds since they are so stable.

Polymers, of any kind, need a way to be polymerized. This means they need some sort of functionality on them that can be reacted with. Polyvinylchloride (PVC) for instance is made from vinyl chloride which has the electron poor double bonds which link together in the polymerization reaction.

Now couple these two things together. It is not economically feasible to make plastics in this way.
 
  • Like
Likes Stephanus
Kekule said:
Plastics are polymers of hydrocarbons. There are many things to consider about why it is very difficult (sometimes currently impossible) and very economically inefficient to make plastics from the starting materials you mentioned.

Carbon, in the form of CO2, is incredibly stable. It takes a significant amount of energy to functionalize the CO double bonds since they are so stable.

Polymers, of any kind, need a way to be polymerized. This means they need some sort of functionality on them that can be reacted with. Polyvinylchloride (PVC) for instance is made from vinyl chloride which has the electron poor double bonds which link together in the polymerization reaction.

Now couple these two things together. It is not economically feasible to make plastics in this way.

Thanks for your answer.
It's just an idea. If fusion power is in operational and if we can gain limitless clean energy...
We'll be free completely from oil dependency
 
Stephanus said:
Can plastic be made NOT FROM oil?

Think this way: plants are capable of producing polymers using the compounds you have mentioned. Cellulose, caoutchouc, DNA, proteins - these are all polymers. While they don't necessarily fit the notion of 'plastic' in a common understanding of the word, they share many general chemical properties. So from the purely chemical point of view answer to your question is "yes".

Whether it is economically viable is a completely different question.
 
Borek said:
Think this way: plants are capable of producing polymers using the compounds you have mentioned. Cellulose, caoutchouc, DNA, proteins - these are all polymers. While they don't necessarily fit the notion of 'plastic' in a common understanding of the word, they share many general chemical properties. So from the purely chemical point of view answer to your question is "yes".

Whether it is economically viable is a completely different question.
That's why Sun have helped us making plastic hundreds of millions of years ago?
It's just that someone in the other thread says that we can't be independent from oil, even though we are able to build fusion power plants. But that's out off scope :smile:
 
Stephanus said:
That's why Sun have helped us making plastic hundreds of millions of years ago?
It's just that someone in the other thread says that we can't be independent from oil, even though we are able to build fusion power plants. But that's out off scope :smile:
About the fusion power, it's not yet feasible.
Oil is a great start-up for the chemical industry. And while most of it is used for power generation only about 3% goes to chemical plants, and a fraction of that to plastics. That could in theory and a very expensive practice be replaced by other hydrocarbon sources, for example vegetable oil (which requires a lot of chemical processing).
But the main issue IMO is the air transportation, were fueling airplanes takes around 6% (not exact just google) of the world supply.
On land you could build electric solutions, yet in air we have no other high capacity energy storage method to date to rival with hydrocarbons. So we will survive life without oil, but we will not fly that much.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top