Can Radio Telescopes Capture Detailed Images of Asteroids and Their Moons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andy Resnick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Asteroid 2004-B186, with a maximum magnitude of 9.5, is currently passing Earth, making it visible with binoculars and small telescopes. Observers are encouraged to capture images, as the asteroid's movement is slow enough to be discernible in photographs taken 10-15 minutes apart. A forum member successfully captured video of the asteroid using a Celestron 80ED telescope and a Sony NEX5T camera, processing the footage with PIPP and AVS video converter. The discussion highlights the challenges and techniques involved in imaging asteroids and their moons, particularly using radio telescopes for high-resolution captures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of asteroid magnitudes and visibility (e.g., magnitude 9.5)
  • Familiarity with astrophotography techniques (e.g., using Celestron 80ED and Sony NEX5T)
  • Knowledge of video processing software (e.g., PIPP, AVS video converter)
  • Basic principles of radio telescope imaging
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for capturing and processing astrophotography images
  • Learn about the capabilities and limitations of radio telescopes in imaging small celestial bodies
  • Explore the use of intervalometers in astrophotography
  • Investigate the characteristics and behavior of asteroids and their moons
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophotographers, and researchers interested in capturing and analyzing images of asteroids and their moons.

Andy Resnick
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
7,719
Reaction score
3,874
Asteroid 2004-B186 is passing by this evening (monday), with a maximum magnitude 9.5 (visible with bionculars/small telescopes). Here's a chart:

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/images/2004bl86_starchart.jpg

Hoping for a (reasonably) clear evening...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
wall to wall cloudy with rain here in eastern Australia :(
 
Hm. 10 degrees of movement per 4 hours.

Not fast enough to be discernible to the eye, except if really close to some background stars.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Hm. 10 degrees of movement per 4 hours.

Not fast enough to be discernible to the eye, except if really close to some background stars.

but easily picked up in photo's say 10 - 15 minutes apart :)

D
 
The "Cloudy Nights" astro forum I'm on has a guy that posted his video of the asteroid to Youtube...



his comments in the forum are as follows ...

Pretty much sacrificed everything to optimize the video. Somebody better than me could probably separate the asteroid, process the background, then merge back the asteroid.
Celestron 80ED, Sony NEX5T, 3 second jpgs (the jpg format was a futile effort to minimize stuttering). ISO 6400 to keep the individual exposures short. Video made by PIPP, compressed with AVS video converter for upload.
Thanks to SergeC, whose lovely picture inspired me to press on when I thought I'd messed up (just imaged for a while before and after, this is 300 frames from 600 taken), Astronewb for his excellent stuff on the ZEQ25, TorstenEdlmann for pointing out the virtues of PIPP for another purpose, and tazer for the intervalometer program that drives the NEX.
Best viewed full screen, the asteroid enters on the lower edge, 2/3 left.
so cool! :)

cheers
Dave
 
Pretty awesome radio-photos , Greg. I was unaware about such small asteroids having moons... Furthermore, that is an incredible series of shots, and showing great detail. I wish they would have given the time between each frame so we could determine the rotation rate; it appears to be a shot from directly above the rotation axis.. However, I am sort of stumped as to how they got such high resolution...down to several meters using a radio telescope.?. Yikes; Wasn't this thing almost 3 times the lunar distance. I find it hard to believe Goldstone can even get that sort of resolution on the lunar surface...I' certainly have never seen such. Maybe I'm just not up to date on radio imaging.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K