Can Random Number Generators Detect Global Events?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the hypothesis that random number generators (RNGs) may detect statistical anomalies during significant global events, potentially reflecting changes in collective human consciousness. The conversation explores the implications of this idea, its feasibility, and the nature of the events considered significant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that major world events create emotional ripples that could be detected by RNGs, as proposed by researchers at Princeton University.
  • One participant questions the validity of the claim that RNGs can reflect collective consciousness, citing the law of large numbers and the nature of post-hoc predictions.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism by comparing the concept to "high tech palmistry," implying a lack of scientific rigor.
  • A participant notes the absence of a clear correlation between events and RNG observations, suggesting that without predictive capability or logical evidence, the discussion lacks substance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity of the hypothesis that RNGs can detect global events. While some find the concept intriguing, others challenge its scientific basis and feasibility, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the ambiguity surrounding what constitutes a "significant global event" and the lack of empirical evidence to support claims of correlation between RNG anomalies and such events.

SF
It’s no secret that major world events send ripples of collective emotion through communities—witness the outpourings of grief and charity after 9-11, the Southeast Asian tsunami and Hurricane Katrina—but what if those ripples could be felt without the aid of TV broadcasts and Web news reports? What if such events made a psychic impression independent of any sort of human communication? Sounds like a bunch of New-Age hooey, but researchers at Princeton University, and one graduate of NYU’s Interactive Telecommunications program, are exploring the possibility with the help of random number generators.

Without going into too much detail about the Princeton project (you can read more about it at the link below), researchers found, over the course of a 30-year project, that during significant global events, random number generators present statistical anomalies that could conceivably be chalked up to changes in the collective human consciousness.

Even if you’re skeptical about this hypothesis, NYU grad Rob Seward’s thesis project, the “Consciousness Field Resonator,” is worthy of attention. Seward built a random-number generator (housed in a handsome copper box) that hangs on the wall and alerts users of statistical anomalies with a series of bright lights. When the lights flash, you’re left to wonder what’s causing the alert. Is it the bombing in Lebanon or Iraq? A World Cup victory? Shiloh Jolie-Pitt’s birthday? Whole new systems of superstition could be built around this thing. Sure, it’s art first and foremost, but it’s also a really interesting use of technology and a kick-ass DIY project. Download instructions for making your own here. —Megan Miller

http://www.popsci.com/article/2006-07/diy-esp

My explanation:
1) statistical anomalies are to be expected, due to the law of big numbers.
2) they're doing post-hoc predictions: "when statistical anomaly occurs => read the news and find the event"
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
What constitutes a "significant global event"?
"that could conceivably be" seems I don't know... NOT very convincing.

It also seems like a test for this could be possible, but won't happen. You'd have to launch some missiles at some villages or cities and see if anything gets picked up.
 
Since there is no way to correlate events to observations, I am locking this. If these folks ever manage to make a predication or provide some logical evidence to show that these are anything more than random coincidences, we can pursue this further.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K