Can Riemann's Function Prove an Equation for Prime Numbers?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Riemann's function and its potential to prove an equation related to prime numbers. Specifically, the function defined as ψ(x) = ∑ e^{-n²πx} satisfies the equation 2ψ(x) + 1 = x^{-1/2}(2ψ(1/x) + 1). Participants suggest that doubling the function and adding one may stem from summing over all integers, but this approach does not yield a proof. For further understanding, Harold Edwards' book is recommended for a detailed study of the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann's Hypothesis and its implications on prime number distribution
  • Familiarity with mathematical series and convergence, particularly exponential series
  • Knowledge of functional equations and their applications in number theory
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Riemann's Hypothesis and its connection to prime number theory
  • Explore the properties of the function ψ(x) and its applications
  • Read Harold Edwards' book for a comprehensive understanding of the topic
  • Investigate functional equations in number theory for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced concepts related to prime numbers and Riemann's work.

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
Assuming that I understood correctly one claim from the Riemann's On the Number of Prime Numbers less than a Given Quantity, then if we define a function

[tex] \psi:]0,\infty[\to\mathbb{R},\quad \psi(x) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} e^{-n^2\pi x},[/tex]

it satisfies an equation

[tex] 2\psi(x) + 1 = x^{-\frac{1}{2}}\Big(2\psi\big(\frac{1}{x}\big) + 1\Big).[/tex]

Anyone knowing how to prove that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well just glancing at it, doubling that function and adding one would appear to result from just summing over all integers n. see if that helps.
doesn't seem to.

or read harold edwards book studying this paper in detail.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K