Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the use of real scientific references and resources by science fiction writers to enhance their narratives. Participants share suggestions for credible online sources across various scientific disciplines, including physics, and discuss the importance of accurate scientific representation in their works.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- One participant seeks online resources that aggregate scientific information across multiple disciplines to support their hard sci-fi novel writing.
- Another participant suggests specific sources like Nature, Lancet, WHO, and CDC for biology and medicine, while recommending LHC and NASA for physics updates.
- A participant expresses uncertainty about the type of references needed and seeks clarification on the term "accredited" in relation to scientific news aggregators.
- One writer describes their sci-fi plot set in 1909 and shares calculations regarding the impact of an asteroid collision, referencing the use of scientific articles to support their findings.
- Participants mention the availability of articles without paywalls and suggest using platforms like Research Gate for accessing scientific papers.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree on the importance of using credible scientific sources for writing sci-fi, but there is no consensus on which specific resources are best or what constitutes an "accredited" source.
Contextual Notes
Some participants express varying levels of familiarity with scientific research, indicating a potential gap in understanding how to effectively utilize scientific references in their writing.