Can someone explain curved space time?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of curved space-time, its relationship with gravity, and the implications for time as it relates to speed and gravitational fields. Participants explore analogies, theoretical implications, and personal interpretations of these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants seek simple analogies to understand curved space-time and its connection to gravity and time dilation.
  • One participant describes a garbage bag analogy to illustrate how mass causes curvature in space-time, affecting the motion of objects.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the relationship between speed, gravity, and time, noting examples of time dilation and its implications.
  • A participant proposes that matter displaces space-time, suggesting that gravity is a result of this displacement rather than a pulling force.
  • One participant discusses the relationship between time, gravity, and the smallest measures of distance, suggesting that time changes at different rates depending on proximity to mass.
  • Another participant emphasizes the idea that space has a "shape" influenced by matter and energy distribution, and recommends a book for further understanding.
  • One participant mentions an illustration involving a plastic sheet and a weighted ball to explain distortions in space-time, while expressing confusion over apparent contradictions in time relativity.
  • Another participant succinctly states that both special and general relativity address the effects of speed and gravity on time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion regarding the relationship between curved space-time, gravity, and time dilation. There is no consensus on the best analogy or explanation, and multiple interpretations and questions remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding, particularly regarding the implications of time dilation and the nature of gravity in relation to space-time curvature. Some analogies may not fully capture the complexities of these concepts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring concepts in physics and astronomy, particularly in relation to general and special relativity, as well as individuals seeking intuitive explanations of complex theories.

Djrob99
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have become very interested in physics and astronomy recently and have started dabbling.

I have been reading about curved space time and its association with gravity. I've also been reading about time as it is related to travel at the speed of light.

Can anyone explain the concept of curved space time using some type of simple analogy that might stick with me? Also, why is it that time slows as we near the speed of light? Are the two related?

Thanks for being patient with someone who crunches numbers for a living!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Djrob99 said:
I have become very interested in physics and astronomy recently and have started dabbling.

I have been reading about curved space time and its association with gravity. I've also been reading about time as it is related to travel at the speed of light.

Can anyone explain the concept of curved space time using some type of simple analogy that might stick with me? Also, why is it that time slows as we near the speed of light? Are the two related?

Thanks for being patient with someone who crunches numbers for a living!

Curved space time and gravity is known as General Relativity. Search google for a picture of it. It's a simple concept when you see it. Basically, get a garbage bag and suspend it over the ground. You can hold it or make some crazy contraption, but it need to be horizontal or parallel to the ground. Take a ball and put it in the middle. This is a very simple representation of gravity. Roll another bouncy ball on the garbage bag and it will curve to the ball.

In reference to speed vs. time, that's known as Time Dilation. It's part of Special Relativity. The faster you go, the slower time travels relative to someone not moving as fast. From your point of view, it wouldn't feel like time is moving slower at all.

General Relativity and gravity also affect time. The more gravity, the slower time goes relative to someone under less gravity. Again, you wouldn't feel like time is running any slower. It all revolves around the fact that gravity affects space and time. I don't think this is related to Special Relativity, but I could be wrong.

All of these concepts are difficult to explain. I'm sure someone else here could do a better job than I can.
 
Thanks Zorn dawg,

I've seen a similar example to what you told me, so I am ok with the concept of things like light curving in space to adjust to the mass/gravity of an object in space. I'm just having a hard time getting my head around time being different the faster you go or the less gravity you're exposed to.

I saw an example where someone was trying to explain how theorectically time could curve and cause closed time loops or curve and go backward in time and I was like "uh, I don't think so" but then I read about curved space time and it almost seems as though some physicists agree, at least in part.
 
I am just an interested amateur. My way of thinking about space-time is that matter displaces space-time. So the Earth being matter displaces space- time around it: causing space- time to warp a little. This warping is gravity. Another way I look at it is that the Earth is not pulling you to the surface but that the warping of space-time is pushing toward the surface. My thoughts may be way off on this and if so :someone please let me know.
 
Time, gravity and the smallest measure of distance are related.

Time changes at different rates in different places.
Time changes the quickest where there are no objects.
Objects tend to slow down time in their general vicinity. That is time can not go as fast near objects. In addition, the smallest measure of distance (subatomic) expands as one moves closer to objects.

Gravity is the response of objects to differances in the minimum distances-rate of time. That is objects save energy by moving towards areas of slower time (with accompanying larger minimum subatomic distances).

In general:

dS^2 = c^2*dT^2 + dD^2

where:

dS is difference in space time,
c is the speed of light,
dT is difference in time,
dD is difference in distance.
 
The basic idea is that space itself has a "shape", and the shape of the space depends on the distribution of matter and energy within it. So there are basically 2 parts here - 1) try to get a feel for what "curved space" means, and 2) learn how the presence of matter effects the shape of space.

For a long time I was really stuck on concept 1): that space could even have a "shape" on its own. I could only think about it in terms of being embedded in a bigger space, which is a very limiting way to view it.

To get a good intuitive feel, I would highly recommend the book "The Shape of Space" by mathematician and MacArthur fellow Jeffrey Weeks. It was written so that smart high school students or interested laymen could understand it, and it has lots of pictures and analogies to explain things, but it is the real-deal - there are no "little white lies" or oversimplifications. Somehow by the end of the book it actually manages to build up to a very respectable level in terms of the mathematical concepts discussed.

Anyways once you have got 1) figured out, then 2) should follow pretty easily.
 
I did see an illustration this weekend that made sense. It was the ol' plastic sheet with a weighted ball in the middle illustration. That made sense to me in terms of how objects cause distortions in the "fabric" of space and how smaller objects are drawn to that larger object.

The problem I'm still having is that there seems to be contradictions in the relativity of time as it has been described to me, but I know that's not the case.

For example, I've seen that time would slow to basically a stop if one could travel at light speed and that time runs faster at someones head than at their feet when they are standing on Earth because they are closer to the "mass" of Earth at their feet. I guess I'm thinking about being out in space and traveling at light speed as being contradictory to the analogy of time moving faster at your feet, because if you are out in space it seems that time would be moving faster.

Anyway, I'll try and find the book that maze suggested. I do love this stuff! Thanks for the help.
 
In Einstein’s theory of special relativity he says that traveling at the speed of light can effect time
In Einstein’s theory of general relativity he says that a gravitational field can effect time
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K