Can someone explain the mathematics of this formula for Venus' orbit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematics of Venus' orbit, particularly focusing on a formula related to its retrograde motion and the claims made in an accompanying graphic. Participants explore the implications of orbital resonances, the validity of the ratios presented, and the overall interpretation of the data in a scientific context.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the formula for Venus' retrograde motion and requests a layman's explanation.
  • Another participant argues that the claims regarding a 13:8 mean motion resonance are numerological rather than scientifically valid, suggesting that large integer ratios may not represent real physical resonances.
  • A participant questions whether the discussion constitutes pseudo-science, implying skepticism about the validity of the claims made in the graphic.
  • Some participants agree that while certain resonances like 2:1 are meaningful, the approximate 13:8 resonance lacks significance due to the difficulty in finding a ratio that accurately represents the relationship.
  • One participant points out that the graphic inaccurately claims the ratio of Earth's period to Venus' is the Golden ratio, noting a discrepancy of 0.46% and questioning the validity of the resonance claim.
  • Another participant critiques the graphical representation of Venus' orbit, stating it does not accurately depict the actual path Venus would trace around the Sun as viewed from Earth, suggesting it is based on a geocentric model.
  • A simulation is mentioned that demonstrates the non-closure of the orbit pattern over time, reinforcing the argument that the 13:8 ratio is not a meaningful resonance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the claims made in the graphic, with multiple competing views regarding the significance of the 13:8 ratio and its interpretation as a resonance. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the validity of the claims.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the graphical representation and the assumptions underlying the claims about orbital resonances. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations regarding the mathematical relationships presented.

Niaboc67
Messages
249
Reaction score
3
I've always been interested by the pattern within venus' orbit around the sun. I found this image and the formula of its retrograde motion in the upper right hand corner which confused me. What does it mean? can someone break this down in layman's terms?

http://www.tokenrock.com/stock/harmonics_venus.jpg

Thank you
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's numerology, pure and simple. Venus and Earth are close to being in, but not exactly in a 13:8 mean motion resonance. That graphic is pretending the relation is exact.

Orbital resonances are important, there's no doubt. However, whether a resonance exists becomes a bit numerological when the integers are large. When it comes to resonances, anything involving a number larger than five: That's large. Given any real number, one can always find a pair of integers whose ratio is close to that real number. The rationals are dense in R. That near 13:8 mean motion resonance might represent a real physics-based resonance, or it just be a numerological circumstance. From what I can tell, most solar system dynamicists view it as a numerological circumstance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: |Glitch|
Would it be fair to say this is pseudo-science?
 
I think so. Resonances like 2:1 are interesting and they often have some meaning, but an approximate 13:8 resonance... it is hard to find a ratio where no similar fraction gives a reasonable approximation.
 
Yes, the graphic seems to claim that the ratio of the Earth's period to Venus' is the Golden ratio, but it isn't-- it's off by 0.46%. That's remarkably close, I'll give them that, but it still could be coincidence. As said above, it is also close to 13/8, which is at least a ratio of integers so sounds more like a resonance, though I don't know which would be more convincing-- that it is a kind of resonance, or that it is the Golden ratio. What is a larger error is that the graphic seems to indicate that the orbits return to their original configuration in 8 Earth orbits (which is what you'd need for a 13/8 ratio to make a figure with 5-fold symmetry as shown), but if one uses the Golden ratio as depicted, then the Golden ratio times 8 = 12.944, not an integer so the figure would not actually be closed. It's pretty close, but resonances usually play out over lots and lots of orbits, so it wouldn't matter much that it is nearly periodic over 8 Earth orbits-- it would matter that it is not exactly periodic over any number of Earth orbits, so it's not a resonance.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
The image is not realistic. That's not the path Venus would trace around the Sun as viewed from Earth. That's the path Venus would trace around the Earth in a top-down view of a Geocentric universe.

You can try it for yourself here: http://orbitsimulator.com/gravitySimulatorCloud/venusPentagram.html

This simulation runs in your browser, so you don't need to download anything to try it.

Watch as Venus traces a pentagram around Earth. It will take 8 simulated years. When it come back to repeat the pattern, it doesn't quite line up. This demonstrates what others here have said. The 13:8 ratio is almost, but not quite perfect. Therefore it is meaningless.

Although only the Sun, Earth, Moon and Venus are visible, the gravitational effects of all the planets are included in this simulation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
24K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K