Can someone explain work and force problems to me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter emma123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around concepts of work and force in physics, specifically addressing two homework problems. The first problem concerns whether work is done by static friction while walking, and the second explores if multiple forces can do work on a body simultaneously.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the nature of work done by static friction and whether multiple forces can contribute to work on a body at the same time. Some participants provide explanations and examples to clarify these concepts.

Discussion Status

Participants have offered insights into the questions raised, with some agreeing on the answers while others introduce additional considerations regarding scenarios where forces may not do work. The discussion includes various interpretations of the problems, indicating a productive exploration of the topics.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific conditions under which work may be zero, such as when forces result in no displacement or when their vector sum is zero. The conversation reflects an ongoing examination of these principles without reaching a definitive conclusion.

emma123
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
hi i need help on two of my homework problems one on work and the other on force
As you walk, there is a static frictional force between your shoes and the ground. Is any work done? Explain your answer.

If three objects exert forces on a body, can they all do work at the same time? Explain. (for this question I'm thinking the answer is yes but I'm not sure about it)

I can't figure them out, it would be great if someone can help me Thanks!:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your first case, the answer is no because the static friction force does not act over a distance.

For your second case, if you have three concurrent forces (fancy word for three forces acting along the same line), then you can vectorially (fancy word for add each contribution in the x and y direction)add them into a single resultant force. So the answer is yes. Because this single resultant force will do work on the body. Therefore, each of the forces that make up this resultant must do a proportional amount of work to contribute to the total work done.

Maybe some numbers will help. If I push you with a force of 4N, and my friend also pushes you at the same point with 5N for 1 meter, together we BOTH push you with 9N. You could say that I do 4Joules of work, and my friend does 5Joules of work. And together, we both do 9Joules.

Equivalently, I could say that we both impart a 9N force for 1 meter, and the net result is 9Joules. In the end, 9Joules is 9Joules.

You could expand this example to (n) number of friends pushing on you, provided you have that many friends :wink:
 
Last edited:
thanks for the help cyrusabdollahi! Appreciate it!:smile:
 
Although the answer to the second question is yes, there can also be situations where three forces acting on a body does no work. This is when their resultant is 0, ie the three force vectors chould form the sides of a triangle taken in order .
 
When you push the ground backward with your foot, the ground exerts an equal force on you in the forward direction which propels you. For the time that you exert a force on the ground (and the ground exerts a force on you) the point of application of the force does not move hence the work done is zero.

As for your second question, in general if three (or more) forces act on a body so that their resultant is zero, all you can say is that the net force is zero

[tex]\vec{F_{net}} = 0[/tex]

and (if the forces cause equal displacements)

[tex]\int_{i}^{f}\vec{F_{net}}\bullet d\vec{l} = 0[/tex]

But in a complex case if force [itex]\vec{F_{i}}[/itex] gives rise to a displacement [itex]\delta\vec{r_{i}}[/itex] then the net work done is

[tex]\sum_{i}\vec{F_{i}}\bullet\delta\vec{r_{i}}[/tex]

So the previous argument which seems obvious is valid for a rigid body where there can be no relative displacement between two points on the body.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K