Can someone help me understand and evaluate the Riemann zeta function?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on understanding and evaluating the Riemann zeta function, specifically regarding the non-trivial zero counting function Z_n(n) and its implications for proving the Riemann hypothesis. Participants explore the possibility of evaluating \zeta(\sigma + iZ_n) and suggest using numerical methods for specific evaluations, such as \zeta(1/2 + 5i). Additionally, the conversation touches on the relationship between this approach and Merten's conjecture, noting that while Merten's conjecture has been disproven, this does not affect the validity of the Riemann hypothesis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis and functions
  • Familiarity with the Riemann zeta function and its properties
  • Knowledge of numerical methods for function evaluation
  • Concepts related to Merten's conjecture and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Riemann zeta function in detail
  • Learn numerical methods for evaluating complex functions
  • Research the implications of Merten's conjecture on the Riemann hypothesis
  • Explore advanced topics in complex analysis related to non-trivial zeros
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of number theory, and researchers interested in the Riemann hypothesis and complex analysis will benefit from this discussion.

epkid08
Messages
264
Reaction score
1
I still don't understand a few things.


Let's say we had a non-trivial zero counting function, [tex]Z_n(n)[/tex], for the riemann zeta function. Couldn't we fairly easily prove the riemann hypothesis by evaluating [tex]\zeta (\sigma+iZ_n)[/tex], solving for [tex]\sigma[/tex], then proving it for all n using induction?


On another note, I still need help in evaluating the actual function. Can someone show me, step by step, how to evaluate say, [tex]\zeta (1/2 + 5i)[/tex]? Please be specific
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use (21) or (25) on http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RiemannZetaFunction.html in the evaluations, though you'll have to resort to numerical methods sooner or later.

Of the attempt at proving the Riemann hypothesis, I can only say that the approach you suggest is similar to reducing the problem to Merten's conjecture (by a Mobius reciprocation)- a proof of which would imply the Riemann hypothesis! However, Merten's conjecture has been shown false (though its falsity does not imply the falsity of the Riemann hypothesis).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K