Can Zeta ζ(½+it) be interpreted as a Wave function?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
2 replies · 3K views
Jason C
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In a recent article by BBM in Physical Review Letters highlights another approach to link QM to Zeta to Prove R.H. There approach proved unsuccessful. I want to ask professional Physicists if the following new approach have merit in connecting the Zeta function to QM? This new line of attack is interpreting the wave graph of ζ(½+it) of Zeta as a wave function. Those wave curves in the graph of ζ(½+it) could be describing the atomic nuclei the Eigenvalue(nontrivial zeros) are related to. It is a new Complex version of the Parity Operator and it is Hermitian. It's eigenvalues can mirror the nontrivial zeros of Zeta. Could this wave function interpretation of ζ(½+it) be the new approach in proving Riemann Hypothesis using Physics? The jpeg attachments are visual representations of this new line of attack for proving RH.
51R5i5BrGQL.jpg

zzzzzxxxx3.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RH is a mathematical statement, so it can be proved (or disproved) only by mathematics. Physics cannot prove RH. Perhaps a proof may be based on some mathematical tool, such as a Hermitian operator, which has applications in physics, but still the proof of RH cannot depend on physics.