Can someone please show me why e[itex]^{-ikx}[/itex] +

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BadAtMath6
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 3K views
BadAtMath6
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can someone please show me why e[itex]^{-ikx}[/itex] + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] simplifies to 2e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] instead of 1+e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]??
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


BadAtMath6 said:
Can someone please show me why e[itex]^{-ikx}[/itex] + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] simplifies to 2e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] instead of 1+e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]??
It doesn't at all. It is equal to 2cos(kx).
 


Ok, yes, that's true and I can get there if I change e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] to cos(kx) + i*sin(kx). But I'm having exponent issues if I don't change it into sine and cosine (i.e. [itex]\frac{1}{e^{ikx}}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{e^{ikx}}{1}[/itex] ). Wouldn't that simplify to 1 + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]?
 


Well, neither of your answers are really correct. Your answer is already in about as simple a form as it can get... maybe this could be simpler?

[tex]e^{-i k x} \left( 1 + e^{2 i k x} \right)[/tex]
 


BadAtMath6 said:
Ok, yes, that's true and I can get there if I change e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] to cos(kx) + i*sin(kx). But I'm having exponent issues if I don't change it into sine and cosine (i.e. [itex]\frac{1}{e^{ikx}}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{e^{ikx}}{1}[/itex] ). Wouldn't that simplify to 1 + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]?

I worked through the initial expression and also came to [itex]1+e^{ikx}[/itex]
 


symbolipoint said:
I worked through the initial expression and also came to [itex]1+e^{ikx}[/itex]

Show us your work. You're making a mistake here somewhere.
 


BadAtMath6 said:
Can someone please show me why e[itex]^{-ikx}[/itex] + e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] simplifies to 2e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex] instead of 1+e[itex]^{ikx}[/itex]??

I just noticed: You edited the original post for a sign change. I worked with what you wrote originally, e^(-ikx) - e^(ikx), [itex]e^{-ikx}-e^{ikx}[/itex]
 


As the addition instead of the subtraction, this process:
Using t=kx,

cos(-t)+i*sin(-t) + cos(t)+ i*sin(t)
= cos(t) - i*sin(t) + cos(t) +i*sin(t)
= cos(t) + cos(t) + i*sin(t) - i*sin(t)
= 2cos(t)

Please check my understanding of these steps, since I cannot think of a way to transform that back to exponential form.
 


Yup, you got that part right. The thing is, you started with the exponential form for 2cos(t). You started with

[tex]e^{- i t} + e^{i t}[/tex]

and ended with 2 cos(t). What you started with IS the exponential form.