MHB Can Subgroups Form a Group by Union Without Containing Each Other?

Mathelogician
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
Here i ask the fisrt serie of questions i couldn't solve;
A basic knowledge of group theory is supposed for solving them!
------------------------------------------------------------

1- Can you find 3 subgroups H, k and L of a group G such that H U k U L = G ;and no one of the 3 subgroups is a subgroup of the union of the other 2 subgroups { e.g., H is not a subgroup of (k U L) } ? ... [ In a simpler case assume that G is finite and |H|=|k|=|L|=|G|/2.]2- Is (R,+) finitely generated? Why?

3- let A,B<G and G be a finite group such that AB is not equal to AB. Then show that |G|>= |A|+|B|.------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This topic is still under construction...

I have asked the OP to show some work or thoughts, and to create a new topic for the third question, so I ask that everyone wait until this has been completed before giving help.

Once the topics are completed, I will delete my post.

Thank you.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Back
Top