Can Subgroups Have a Volume in Linear Matrix Spaces?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter raopeng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Volume
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "volume" in the context of subgroups within linear matrix spaces, particularly focusing on the special linear group SL(n, R) and its properties. Participants explore the implications of subgroup dimensions, volume measures, and integration techniques related to these mathematical structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a group can have a "volume," specifically referencing SL(n, R) and its determinant condition.
  • Another participant suggests that while the subgroup exists in n^2-space, it may have volume zero as a subset of an n^2-1-dimensional manifold.
  • A different viewpoint indicates that the region may possess non-zero k-volume for k < n^2, despite having zero n^2-volume.
  • It is noted that SL(n, R) is non-compact and thus has infinite volume, contrasting with compact Lie groups that have finite volume computable via integration.
  • The concept of Haar measure is introduced, which allows for defining integrals over topological groups, emphasizing its translation-invariance.
  • Participants discuss the significance of integration in averaging group actions, even if volume is not the primary focus.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the construction of Killing metrics for SU(2) and how to define the region for integration, proposing a specific formula for the volume of SO(n) but questioning its validity.
  • Another participant notes that a similar approach applies to SU(n), with a different dimensional consideration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the concept of volume in relation to subgroups, with no consensus reached on the implications of volume measures or the specifics of integration techniques. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the validity of certain volume calculations and the construction of metrics.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about dimensions and volume measures, as well as the dependence on definitions of volume and integration within the context of group theory.

raopeng
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Can group have a "volume"?

For example, SL(n, R) is a subgroup in a linear matrix space with det A = 1. So can this equation represent a certain "region" in the n-dimensional linear space and therefore that it has a "volume"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If so, it would be in n^2-space, not n-space, because this is the dimension of the matrix space. But it would be a subset of an n^2-1-dimensional manifold in this space, thus having volume 0.
 


Thank you. Didn't think it through carefully...
 


But your region may have non-zero k-volume for k< n^2 . The topology on subgroups

I'm familiar with turns a matrix [ai] into a point in R^(n^2) by [ai]<-->[a11,a12

,...ann] . This is a region in R^(n^2), and, while, as Erland said, it has zero

n^2-volume, it may have non-zero k-volume for k<n^2 .
 


In fact, SL(n,R) is non-compact, so it has infinite volume.

The compact Lie groups all have finite volume, which you can compute without too much difficulty. Constructing a volume form is similar to the construction of a metric (i.e., the Cartan-Killing metric). Then you just integrate this over the group.

Note: As a subset of R^n^2, most groups have measure zero. What I mean is the intrinsic volume of the group manifold, which is k-dimensional (and k < n^2).
 


There is a related notion of what's called a 'Haar measure' on a topological group, which allows one to define an integral over the group.
 


excellent point! presumably Haar measure is a translation invariant measure.

integration is about averaging. thus an integration on a group allows one to average

the action of a group on a set. so even if volume is not the main idea, integration is still important.
 


Yes, the key property of Haar measure is translation-invariance. So this generalizes averaging over the elements of a finite group by summing as well as integrating over some familiar topological group like the reals. Plus, the Haar integral allows us to do harmonic analysis on locally compact abelian groups (or even non-abelian groups, for that matter, but this is more complicated) which is really cool. But I barely know anything about this, so I should stop now...
 


And I am still a bit confused about how to construct a Killing metrics of, say, SU(2) for integration. And also how can we write the defining region of the group for the integration?
I really appreciate all the help, but some of them are quite beyond my current level. So I have to consider SO(n) in an easier way:
Define Killing form as [itex]\langle A, A \rangle = tr(AA^{T})=tr(E)=n[/itex]. So for SO(n) the region is a sphere with radius √n? And employing the general formula for n^2-sphere volume I obtain: V = [itex]\frac{\pi^{n^2/2}}{\gamma (n^2/2 + 1)}n^{n^2/2}[/itex]. but it looks a bit ridiculous...
 
  • #10


I think for SU(n) it is similar, except the dimension is now 2n^2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K