I Can surface plasmons be used to build GeV gamma-ray lasers?

Click For Summary
Surface plasmons, generated through free-electron pumping, may serve as a novel light source, potentially functioning similarly to free electron lasers. The discussion raises the possibility of achieving high-energy photon generation, specifically in the MeV to GeV range, through plasmonic methods. Current research indicates that while plasmonic acceleration is a concept, traditional plasmon energies typically range from 10 to 100 eV, aligning more with visible light rather than gamma rays. Additionally, GeV electrons primarily produce incoherent bremsstrahlung, suggesting limitations in using plasmonics for high-energy gamma-ray lasers. Overall, the feasibility of replacing ionized gas with plasmonics for gamma-ray generation remains uncertain.
redirmigician
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I read a paper about coherent surface plasmon amplification by free electron pumping in an article a few days ago. It seems to work as some kind of free electron laser-like light source, and I wonder how high the energy of photons can go in this way. Also I read in another paper about "efficient" generation of "Extremely brilliant" and "collimated" MeV to GeV gamma rays in the plasma accelerator. I wonder if plasmonics can replace ionized gas to achieve this. There is indeed an idea of Plasmonic acceleration, right?

More information:
Creating surface plasmon polariton amplification using free-electron pumping to build a new kind of laser https://phys.org/news/2022-11-surface-plasmon-polariton-amplification-free-electron.html via @physorg_com

Extremely brilliant GeV γ-rays from a two-stage laser-plasma accelerator https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz7240#.Y26Z1wQ3Jf4.twitter

#OpenAcces chapter by @IntechOpen: Future Particle Accelerators https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/83039
 
Physics news on Phys.org
redirmigician said:
I read a paper about coherent surface plasmon amplification by free electron pumping in an article a few days ago. It seems to work as some kind of free electron laser-like light source, and I wonder how high the energy of photons can go in this way. Also I read in another paper about "efficient" generation of "Extremely brilliant" and "collimated" MeV to GeV gamma rays in the plasma accelerator. I wonder if plasmonics can replace ionized gas to achieve this. There is indeed an idea of Plasmonic acceleration, right?

More information:
Creating surface plasmon polariton amplification using free-electron pumping to build a new kind of laser https://phys.org/news/2022-11-surface-plasmon-polariton-amplification-free-electron.html via @physorg_com

Extremely brilliant GeV γ-rays from a two-stage laser-plasma accelerator https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz7240#.Y26Z1wQ3Jf4.twitter

#OpenAcces chapter by @IntechOpen: Future Particle Accelerators https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/83039
Plasmons on metal surfaces, as far as I know, usually have energies in the range of 10 to 100 eV. That's more like visible light.
 
The plasma frequency of metals is in the UV, not in the gamma ray range. GeV electrons can only produce incoherent bremsstrahlung.
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...

Similar threads